Bindinglaw

NY · jury_instructions

CJI2d[NY] Penal Law § 265.01(7)

CRIMINAL POSSESSION OF A WEAPON IN THE FOURTH DEGREE (Possession of Explosive Bullet)

activein force · 2026-09-25 – presentas-observed

The (specify) count is Criminal Possession of a Weapon in the Fourth Degree.

Under our law, a person is guilty of Criminal Possession of a Weapon in the Fourth Degree when that person knowingly possesses a bullet containing an explosive substance¹ designed to detonate upon impact.

The following terms used in that definition have a special meaning:

POSSESS means to have physical possession or otherwise

1 In 1974, the Court of Appeals stated that “the statutory terms–‘incendiary’, ‘bomb’ and ‘explosive substance’ -- are susceptible of reasonable application in accordance with the common understanding of men.” People v. Cruz, 34 NY2d 362 (1974).

In 1975, the Appellate Division, First Department, opined that a 1970 definition of “explosive” in Labor Law § 451 applied to the Penal Law in the adjudication of that term in an arson statute. People v McCrawford, 47 AD2d 318 (1st Dept. 1975). (That Labor Law definition was amended after the McCrawford decision. L. 2009, c. 57.) ) But see Matter of Perry, 232 A.D.2d 225 (1st Dept., 1996) (in sustaining a Family Court petition for possession of an explosive, the Court cited Cruz for the proposition that the language of the petition "apprise[d] respondent of the conduct of which he stood accused, giving the term ‘explosive' or ‘incendiary' device, which is not specifically defined in the Penal Law, its everyday meaning.")

In 2001, the Appellate Division, Third Department, citing Cruz, stated that "the term ‘explosive substance' retains its everyday common sense meaning since it is undefined in the Penal Law." People v. Ward, 282 A.D.2d 819 (3rd Dept., 2001). See also People v. Getman, 188 Misc.2d 809 (County Court, 2001)(“this court finds that the essence of the term ‘explosive substance’ is something which is capable of exploding and causing death or injury to person or property”).

to exercise dominion or control over tangible property.²

A person KNOWINGLY possesses a bullet containing an explosive substance designed to detonate upon impact when that person is aware that he or she is in possession of such a bullet.³

In order for you to find the defendant guilty of this crime, the People are required to prove, from all the evidence in the case, beyond a reasonable doubt, both of the following two elements:

1. That on or about (date) , in the county of (county) , the defendant, (defendant's name), possessed a bullet containing an explosive substance designed to detonate upon impact; and

2. That the defendant did so knowingly.

If you find the People have proven beyond a reasonable doubt both of those elements, you must find the defendant guilty of this crime.

If you find the People have not proven beyond a reasonable doubt either one or both of those elements, you must find the defendant not guilty of this crime.

History

Caption: CRIMINAL POSSESSION OF A WEAPON IN THE FOURTH DEGREE (Possession of Explosive Bullet) Penal Law § 265.01(7) (Committed on or after Sept. 1, 1981). Read from the committee's Word file. Prepared by the New York State Unified Court System Committee on Criminal Jury Instructions, Model Colloquies, and Evidence Rules; published by the Unified Court System at nycourts.gov (the internet edition is the only current and official publication of CJI2d).

Provenance

Source
nycourts.gov
Retrieved
2026-09-25
Edition
2026-09-25
Content hash
9c2d88ef67e3578298bb4ef071e739f4cd68013d8ba93c4f866d2b27100f2e5e
View the official source →

The link goes to the issuing authority’s own document — the one we read to produce this record. Where a source publishes whole titles rather than sections, your browser may need a moment to jump to the provision.

Unofficial copy of government-published law, reproduced from official sources with full provenance. Not an official publication; verify against official sources before relying on it in a filing. Records in the 'guidance' corpus, and only that corpus, are sub-regulatory (interpretive guidelines, survey procedures) and are not binding law. Validity bounds follow each jurisdiction's declared temporalBasis.

Coverage · API docs

Bindinglaw

Point-in-time US law with the receipt attached. Source URL, retrieval time, content hash, and validity dates on every answer.

curl api.binding.law/v1/law/coverage

© 2026 binding.law · a Jubal, Inc. productAttorneys and firms never pay. Ever.
CJI2d[NY] Penal Law § 265.01(7) — CRIMINAL POSSESSION… · binding.law