NY · jury_instructions
CJI2d[NY] Penal Law § 200.25
RECEIVING REWARD FOR OFFICIAL MISCONDUCT IN THE SECOND DEGREE
The (specify) count is Receiving Reward For Official Misconduct in the Second Degree.
Under our law, a public servant is guilty of receiving reward for official misconduct in the second degree when that public servant solicits, accepts or agrees to accept any benefit from another person for having violated his or her duty as a public servant.
The following terms used in that definition have a special meaning:
BENEFIT means any gain or advantage to the beneficiary and includes any gain or advantage to a third person pursuant to the desire or consent of the beneficiary.¹
PUBLIC SERVANT means any public officer or employee of the state or of any political subdivision thereof or of any governmental instrumentality within the state, or any person exercising the functions of any such public officer or employee. [The term public servant includes a person who has been elected or designated to become a public servant.]²
Under our law, it is no defense to this charge that the public servant did not have power or authority to perform the act or omission for which the alleged reward was given.³
In order for you to find the defendant guilty of this crime, the People are required to prove, from all the evidence in the case, beyond a reasonable doubt, the following two elements:
1. That on or about (date) , the defendant,
(defendant's name), was a public servant; and
2 That on or about that date in the county of (specify), the defendant solicited, accepted, or agreed to accept a benefit from (specify) for having violated his/her duty as a public servant.
If you find the People have proven beyond a reasonable doubt both of those elements, you must find the defendant guilty of this crime.
If you find the People have not proven beyond a reasonable doubt either one or both of those elements, you must find the defendant not guilty of this crime.
History
Caption: RECEIVING REWARD FOR OFFICIAL MISCONDUCT IN THE SECOND DEGREE Penal Law § 200.25 (Committed on or after September 1, 1973). Read from the committee's Word file. Prepared by the New York State Unified Court System Committee on Criminal Jury Instructions, Model Colloquies, and Evidence Rules; published by the Unified Court System at nycourts.gov (the internet edition is the only current and official publication of CJI2d).
Provenance
- Source
- nycourts.gov
- Retrieved
- 2026-09-25
- Edition
- 2026-09-25
- Content hash
ed7365d9f6493140f72b5af7d67b1310b932996cc8a42c821bc580130705571d
The link goes to the issuing authority’s own document — the one we read to produce this record. Where a source publishes whole titles rather than sections, your browser may need a moment to jump to the provision.
Unofficial copy of government-published law, reproduced from official sources with full provenance. Not an official publication; verify against official sources before relying on it in a filing. Records in the 'guidance' corpus, and only that corpus, are sub-regulatory (interpretive guidelines, survey procedures) and are not binding law. Validity bounds follow each jurisdiction's declared temporalBasis.