Bindinglaw

NY · jury_instructions

CJI2d[NY] Penal Law § 200.20

REWARDING OFFICIAL MISCONDUCT IN THE SECOND DEGREE

activein force · 2026-09-25 – presentas-observed

The (specify) count is Rewarding Official Misconduct in the Second Degree.

Under our law, a person is guilty of rewarding official misconduct in the second degree when that person knowingly confers, or offers or agrees to confer, any benefit upon a public servant for having violated his or her duty as a public servant.

The following terms used in that definition have a special meaning:

BENEFIT means any gain or advantage to the beneficiary and includes any gain or advantage to a third person pursuant to the desire or consent of the beneficiary.¹

PUBLIC SERVANT means any public officer or employee of the state or of any political subdivision thereof or of any governmental instrumentality within the state, or any person exercising the functions of any such public officer or employee. [The term public servant includes a person who has been elected or designated to become a public servant.]²

A person KNOWINGLY confers, or offers or agrees to confer, any benefit upon a public servant for having violated his or her duty as a public servant when that person is aware that he or she is doing so.³

Under our law, it is no defense to this charge that the public servant did not have power or authority to perform the act or omission for which the alleged reward was given.⁴

In order for you to find the defendant guilty of this crime, the People are required to prove, from all the evidence in the case, beyond a reasonable doubt, the following three elements:

1. That on or about (date) , (specify) was a public servant;

2 That on or about that date in the county of (specify), the defendant, (defendant's name), conferred, or offered, or agreed to confer, a benefit upon (specify) for having violated his/her duty as a public servant; and

3. That the defendant did so knowingly.

If you find the People have proven beyond a reasonable doubt each of those elements, you must find the defendant guilty of this crime.

If you find the People have not proven beyond a reasonable doubt any one or more of those elements, you must find the defendant not guilty of this crime.

History

Caption: REWARDING OFFICIAL MISCONDUCT IN THE SECOND DEGREE Penal Law § 200.20 (Committed on or after September 1, 1973). Read from the committee's Word file. Prepared by the New York State Unified Court System Committee on Criminal Jury Instructions, Model Colloquies, and Evidence Rules; published by the Unified Court System at nycourts.gov (the internet edition is the only current and official publication of CJI2d).

Provenance

Source
nycourts.gov
Retrieved
2026-09-25
Edition
2026-09-25
Content hash
0de172a70ad9850781ba8a7304712faf6a8c96712b1e4e09ab39446fc16d5cd8
View the official source →

The link goes to the issuing authority’s own document — the one we read to produce this record. Where a source publishes whole titles rather than sections, your browser may need a moment to jump to the provision.

Unofficial copy of government-published law, reproduced from official sources with full provenance. Not an official publication; verify against official sources before relying on it in a filing. Records in the 'guidance' corpus, and only that corpus, are sub-regulatory (interpretive guidelines, survey procedures) and are not binding law. Validity bounds follow each jurisdiction's declared temporalBasis.

Coverage · API docs

Bindinglaw

Point-in-time US law with the receipt attached. Source URL, retrieval time, content hash, and validity dates on every answer.

curl api.binding.law/v1/law/coverage

© 2026 binding.law · a Jubal, Inc. productAttorneys and firms never pay. Ever.
CJI2d[NY] Penal Law § 200.20 — REWARDING OFFICIAL MIS… · binding.law