NY · jury_instructions
CJI2d[NY] Penal Law § 176.75
STAGING A MOTOR VEHICLE ACCIDENT IN THE SECOND DEGREE
The (specify) count is Staging a Motor Vehicle Accident in the Second Degree.
Under our law, a person is guilty of Staging a Motor Vehicle Accident in the Second Degree when, with intent to commit and in furtherance of a fraudulent insurance act, he or she operates a motor vehicle and intentionally causes a collision involving a motor vehicle.
The following terms used in that definition have a special meaning:
INTENT means conscious objective or purpose. Thus, a person acts with intent to commit a fraudulent insurance act when that person's conscious objective or purpose is to do so.¹ And a person intentionally causes a collision when that person’s conscious objective or purpose is to do so.
A FRAUDULENT INSURANCE ACT is committed by any person who, knowingly and with intent to defraud, presents, causes to be presented, or prepares with knowledge or belief that it will be presented, to or by:
Select appropriate alternative(s):
an insurer,
self insurer, [or]
purported insurer, [or]
purported self insurer, [or]
any agent thereof,
Select if commercial/personal insurance policy is alleged: any written statement as part of, or in support of,
Select appropriate alternative(s):
an application for the issuance of, or the rating of, a commercial insurance policy, [or]
a certificate or evidence of self insurance for commercial
insurance or commercial self insurance, [or]
a claim for payment or other benefit pursuant to an insurance policy or self insurance program for commercial or personal insurance²
Select if health insurance policy is alleged:
any written statement or other physical evidence as
part of, or in support of,
Select appropriate alternative(s):
an application for the issuance of a health insurance policy,³ [or]
a policy or contract or other authorization that provides or allows coverage for, membership or enrollment in, or other services of a public or private health plan,⁴ [or]
a claim for payment, services or other benefit pursuant to such policy, contract or plan⁵
that he or she knows to: (a) contain materially false information concerning any fact material thereto; or (b) conceal, for the purpose of misleading, information concerning any fact material thereto.
In order for you to find the defendant guilty of this crime, the People are required to prove, from all the evidence in the case, beyond a reasonable doubt, each of the following three elements:
(1) That on or about (date) , in the County of (County) , the defendant, (defendant's name)⁶ operated a motor vehicle;
(2) That the defendant did so with intent to commit, and in furtherance of, a fraudulent insurance act; and
a certificate evidencing coverage under a self-insured plan or under a group contract approved by the superintendent of financial services.
(3) That the defendant intentionally caused a collision
involving a motor vehicle.
If you find the People have proven beyond a reasonable doubt each of those elements, you must find the defendant guilty of this crime.
If you find the People have not proven beyond a reasonable doubt any one or more of those elements, you must find the defendant not guilty of this crime.
Page 4 of 4
History
Caption: STAGING A MOTOR VEHICLE ACCIDENT IN THE SECOND DEGREE Penal Law § 176.75 (Committed on or after November 1, 2019). Read from the committee's Word file. Prepared by the New York State Unified Court System Committee on Criminal Jury Instructions, Model Colloquies, and Evidence Rules; published by the Unified Court System at nycourts.gov (the internet edition is the only current and official publication of CJI2d).
Provenance
- Source
- nycourts.gov
- Retrieved
- 2026-09-25
- Edition
- 2026-09-25
- Content hash
2aee1b352f550e64fb721acf7ce1bc57ea40d030ad739c57482d5d61f3ae841d
The link goes to the issuing authority’s own document — the one we read to produce this record. Where a source publishes whole titles rather than sections, your browser may need a moment to jump to the provision.
Unofficial copy of government-published law, reproduced from official sources with full provenance. Not an official publication; verify against official sources before relying on it in a filing. Records in the 'guidance' corpus, and only that corpus, are sub-regulatory (interpretive guidelines, survey procedures) and are not binding law. Validity bounds follow each jurisdiction's declared temporalBasis.