Bindinglaw

NY · jury_instructions

CJI2d[NY] Penal Law § 165.17

UNLAWFUL USE OF CREDIT CARD, (Use of Revoked or Cancelled Card)

activein force · 2026-09-25 – presentas-observed

The (specify) count is Unlawful Use of a Credit Card [or Debit Card] [or Public Benefit Card].

Under our law, a person is guilty of Unlawful Use of a Credit Card [or Debit Card] [or Public Benefit Card] when, in the course of obtaining or attempting to obtain property [or a service], that person uses or displays a credit card [or debit card] [or public benefit card] which he or she knows to be revoked or cancelled.

The following terms used in that definition have a special meaning:

OBTAIN includes, but is not limited to, the bringing about of a transfer or purported transfer of property or a service, or of a legal interest therein, whether to the obtainer or another person.¹

A person ATTEMPTS to obtain property [or a service] by using or displaying a card which he or she knows to be revoked or cancelled when he or she intends to do so and engages in conduct which tends to effect that objective.²

[A CREDIT CARD includes any credit card, credit plate, charge plate, courtesy card or other identification card or device issued by a person to another person which may be used to obtain a cash advance or loan or credit or to purchase or lease property or services on the credit of the issuer or of the holder.]³

[A DEBIT CARD includes a card, plate or other similar device issued by a person to another person which may be used, without a personal identification number or code (or similar identification number or code) (or similar identification), to purchase or lease property or services. The term does not include a credit card or a check, draft or similar instrument.]⁴

[A PUBLIC BENEFIT CARD means any medical assistance card, food stamp assistance card, public assistance card, or any other identification, authorization card or electronic access device issued by the state or a social services district, which entitles a person to obtain public assistance benefits under a local, state or federal program administered by the state, its political subdivisions or social services districts.]⁵

In order for you to find the defendant guilty of this crime, the People are required to prove, from all the evidence in the case, beyond a reasonable doubt, both of the following two elements:

1. That on or about (date) , in the county of (county) , the defendant, (defendant's name) , obtained or attempted to obtain property [or a service] by using or displaying a credit card [or debit card] [or public benefit card] which had been revoked or cancelled; and

2. That, when the defendant did so, he/she knew that such card had been revoked or cancelled.

If you find the People have proven beyond a reasonable doubt both of those elements, you must find the defendant guilty of this crime.

If you find the People have not proven beyond a reasonable doubt either one or both of those elements, you must find the defendant not guilty of this crime.

History

Caption: UNLAWFUL USE OF CREDIT CARD, DEBIT CARD or PUBLIC BENEFIT CARD (Use of Revoked or Cancelled Card) Penal Law § 165.17 (Committed on or after Nov. 1, 1995). Read from the committee's Word file. Prepared by the New York State Unified Court System Committee on Criminal Jury Instructions, Model Colloquies, and Evidence Rules; published by the Unified Court System at nycourts.gov (the internet edition is the only current and official publication of CJI2d).

Provenance

Source
nycourts.gov
Retrieved
2026-09-25
Edition
2026-09-25
Content hash
4622479fc0802bfb8f21658221a77be5541adc7bca29bda0fb0e82aad7e101fc
View the official source →

The link goes to the issuing authority’s own document — the one we read to produce this record. Where a source publishes whole titles rather than sections, your browser may need a moment to jump to the provision.

Unofficial copy of government-published law, reproduced from official sources with full provenance. Not an official publication; verify against official sources before relying on it in a filing. Records in the 'guidance' corpus, and only that corpus, are sub-regulatory (interpretive guidelines, survey procedures) and are not binding law. Validity bounds follow each jurisdiction's declared temporalBasis.

Coverage · API docs

Bindinglaw

Point-in-time US law with the receipt attached. Source URL, retrieval time, content hash, and validity dates on every answer.

curl api.binding.law/v1/law/coverage

© 2026 binding.law · a Jubal, Inc. productAttorneys and firms never pay. Ever.
CJI2d[NY] Penal Law § 165.17 — UNLAWFUL USE OF CREDIT… · binding.law