NY · jury_instructions
CJI2d[NY] Penal Law § 125.26
AGGRAVATED MURDER
The (specify) count is Aggravated Murder.
Under our law, a defendant is guilty of Aggravated Murder when, with intent to cause the death of another person, he or she causes the death of such person,² who was
Select the appropriate category:
a police officer ³
a uniformed court officer of the unified court system
a parole officer in the department of corrections and community supervision ⁴
a probation officer
an employee of the Office of Children & Family Services designated by the director to be a peace officer in the transport and warrant unit⁵
an employee of a state correctional institution,⁶ an employee of a local correction facility
who was at the time of the killing engaged in the course of performing his or her official duties, and the defendant knew or reasonably should have known that the victim was (specify title from the foregoing list), and the defendant was more than eighteen years old at the time of the commission of the crime. ⁷
The following terms used in that definition have a special meaning: ⁸
INTENT means conscious objective or purpose. Thus, a person acts with intent to cause the death of another person when his or her conscious objective or purpose is to cause the death of that person.⁹
A person REASONABLY SHOULD KNOW that a person is a (specify) if, in the same circumstances, a reasonable person in the same position and possessing the same knowledge, would know that such person is a (specify).¹⁰
A (specify) is engaged in the course of performing his or her OFFICIAL DUTIES when he or she is acting pursuant to his or her occupation as a (specify), rather than as a private citizen.¹¹
In order for you to find the defendant guilty of this crime, the People are required to prove, from all of the evidence in the case, beyond a reasonable doubt, each of the following five elements:
1. That on or about (date) , in the County of (County) , the defendant, (defendant's name) , caused the death of (victim) ;
2. That the defendant did so with the intent to cause the death of (victim) ;
3. That, at the time of the killing, (victim) was a (specify) engaged in the course of performing his/her official duties;
4. That, at the time of the killing, the defendant knew or reasonably should have known that (victim) was a (specify); and
5. That the defendant was more than eighteen (18) years old at the time of the commission of the crime.
If you find the People have proven beyond a reasonable doubt each of those elements, you must find the defendant guilty of this crime.
If you find the People have not proven beyond a reasonable doubt any one or more of those elements, you must find the defendant not guilty of this crime.
[NOTE: If either of the affirmative defenses -- Extreme Emotional Disturbance (§ 125.26(2)(a)) or Aiding a Suicide (§ 125.26(2)(b)) -- applies, omit the final two paragraphs of the above charge, and substitute one of the charges in the “Additional Charges” section of Penal Law article 125 charges.
History
Caption: AGGRAVATED MURDER Penal Law § 125.26 (1)(a) (i) , (ii) and (iii) (Committed on or after Dec. 21, 2005 (Revised Dec. 2018). Read from the committee's Word file. Prepared by the New York State Unified Court System Committee on Criminal Jury Instructions, Model Colloquies, and Evidence Rules; published by the Unified Court System at nycourts.gov (the internet edition is the only current and official publication of CJI2d).
Provenance
- Source
- nycourts.gov
- Retrieved
- 2026-09-25
- Edition
- 2026-09-25
- Content hash
26f818c931a11bb9fd0e0fb657c837b20c921fcd06cd8cf0ddd04197f0acaa98
The link goes to the issuing authority’s own document — the one we read to produce this record. Where a source publishes whole titles rather than sections, your browser may need a moment to jump to the provision.
Unofficial copy of government-published law, reproduced from official sources with full provenance. Not an official publication; verify against official sources before relying on it in a filing. Records in the 'guidance' corpus, and only that corpus, are sub-regulatory (interpretive guidelines, survey procedures) and are not binding law. Validity bounds follow each jurisdiction's declared temporalBasis.