NY · jury_instructions
CJI2d[NY] Penal Law § 125.11
AGGRAVATED CRIMINALLY NEGLIGENT HOMICIDE
The (specify) count is Aggravated Criminally Negligent Homicide.
Under our law, a person is guilty of Aggravated Criminally Negligent Homicide when, with criminal negligence, he or she causes the death of a police officer [or peace officer] where such officer was in the course of performing his or her official duties and the defendant knew or reasonably should have known that such victim was a police officer [or peace officer].
The following terms used in that definition have a special meaning:²
A person acts with CRIMINAL NEGLIGENCE with respect to a death when
that person engages in conduct which creates or contributes to a substantial and unjustifiable risk that another person's death will occur,
and when he or she fails to perceive that risk,
and when that risk is of such nature and degree that failure to perceive it constitutes a gross deviation from the standard of care that a reasonable person would observe in the situation.³
You may notice from that definition that CRIMINAL NEGLIGENCE is not the same type of negligence you may be familiar with from a civil lawsuit seeking a money judgment. The carelessness required for criminal negligence is appreciably more serious; it must be such that its seriousness would be apparent to anyone who shares the community's general sense of right and wrong.
A person REASONABLY SHOULD HAVE KNOWN that the victim was a police officer [or peace officer] if, in the same circumstances, a reasonable person in the same position and possessing the same knowledge would have known that the victim was a police officer [or peace officer].⁴
A police officer [or peace officer] is engaged in the course of performing his or her OFFICIAL DUTIES when he or she is acting pursuant to his or her occupation as a police officer [or peace officer], rather than as a private citizen.⁵
In order for you to find the defendant guilty of this crime, the People are required to prove, from all the evidence in the case, beyond a reasonable doubt, each of the following four elements:
1. That on or about (date), in the county of (county), the defendant, (defendant’s name), caused the death of (specify);
2. That the defendant did so with criminal negligence;
3. That, at the time of the incident, (specify) was a police officer [or peace officer] in the course of performing his/her official duties; and
4. That, at the time of the incident, the defendant knew or reasonably should have known that (specify) was a police officer [or peace officer].
If you find the People have proven beyond a reasonable doubt each of those elements, you must find the defendant guilty of this crime.
If you find the People have not proven beyond a reasonable doubt any one or more of those elements, you must find the defendant not guilty of this crime.
History
Caption: AGGRAVATED CRIMINALLY NEGLIGENT HOMICIDE PENAL LAW 125.11 (Committed on or after Dec. 21, 2005) Revised April 2018. Read from the committee's Word file. Prepared by the New York State Unified Court System Committee on Criminal Jury Instructions, Model Colloquies, and Evidence Rules; published by the Unified Court System at nycourts.gov (the internet edition is the only current and official publication of CJI2d).
Provenance
- Source
- nycourts.gov
- Retrieved
- 2026-09-25
- Edition
- 2026-09-25
- Content hash
e43ade280bcbeaf163e0ec263717a4bc4e0e9defa20df5f6e1a64443311f6c4f
The link goes to the issuing authority’s own document — the one we read to produce this record. Where a source publishes whole titles rather than sections, your browser may need a moment to jump to the provision.
Unofficial copy of government-published law, reproduced from official sources with full provenance. Not an official publication; verify against official sources before relying on it in a filing. Records in the 'guidance' corpus, and only that corpus, are sub-regulatory (interpretive guidelines, survey procedures) and are not binding law. Validity bounds follow each jurisdiction's declared temporalBasis.