CJI2d[NY] Penal Law § 105.10(3)

Revised July 2018¹

The (specify) count is Conspiracy in the Fourth Degree.²

Under our law, a person is guilty of Conspiracy in the Fourth Degree when, with intent that conduct constituting the felony of money laundering in the third degree be performed, he or she agrees with one or more persons to engage in or cause the performance of such conduct.

Under our law, a person is guilty of the felony of money laundering in the third degree when (read the applicable portion of the statutory definition of Money Laundering in the Third Degree [Penal Law § 470.10]).

NOTE: If Money Laundering in the Third Degree has been separately charged, the jury should be instructed on that count first and that instruction should be cross-referenced here. If it has not been separately charged, then here read the statutory definition of that felony and any necessary defined terms as set forth in CJI2d for that offense.

Knowledge of a conspiracy does not by itself make the defendant a coconspirator.³ The defendant must intend that conduct constituting the felony of money laundering in the third degree be performed. INTENT means conscious objective or purpose.⁴ Thus, a person acts with the intent that conduct constituting the felony of money laundering in the third degree be performed when his or her conscious objective or purpose is that such conduct be performed.

[Add when appropriate:

Evidence that a defendant was present when others agreed to engage in the performance of a crime does not by itself show that the defendant personally agreed to engage in the conspiracy.⁵]

Under our law, the People must also prove that one of the conspirators committed an overt act in furtherance of the conspiracy.⁶ The agreement to engage in or cause the performance of a crime is not itself an overt act. The overt act must be an independent act that tends to carry out the conspiracy. The overt act can be, but need not be, the commission of the crime that was the object of the conspiracy.⁷

In this case, the alleged overt act[s] is [are]: (specify).

[Note: Add when and to the extent appropriate:

Under our law, it is no defense to a prosecution for conspiracy that, owing to criminal irresponsibility or other legal incapacity or exemption, or to unawareness of the criminal nature of the agreement or the object conduct or of the defendant's criminal purpose or to other factors precluding the mental state required for the commission of conspiracy or the object crime, one or more of the defendant's co-conspirators could not be guilty of conspiracy or the object crime.⁸ In other words, a defendant may be convicted of conspiracy even though one or more or all of the other parties to the agreement are not guilty of conspiracy or (specify the object crime).⁹]

In order for you to find the defendant guilty of this crime, the People are required to prove, from all the evidence in the case, beyond a reasonable doubt, each of the following three elements:

1. That on or about (date), in the County of (County),¹⁰ the defendant, (defendant's name), agreed with one or more persons to engage in or cause the performance of conduct constituting the felony of money laundering in the third degree;

2. That the defendant did so with the intent that such conduct be performed; and

3. That the defendant, or one of the persons with whom he/she agreed to engage in or cause the performance of such conduct, committed [the] [at least one] alleged overt act in furtherance of the conspiracy.

If you find the People have proven beyond a reasonable doubt each of those elements, you must find the defendant guilty of this crime.

If you find the People have not proven beyond a reasonable doubt any one or more of those elements, you must find the defendant not guilty of this crime.