NV · rules
WDCR 48
Default judgments involving child custody
.
1. Affidavit required.
(a) Where a default judgment in an action for divorce involving minor children is sought, and the proposed judgment does not include or refer to a written custody and visitation agreement, the moving party shall attach an affidavit setting forth the following:
(1) The date the parties were separated;
(2) The person with whom the child has lived during the past 6 months; and
(3) The extent of contact the child has had with both parents in the past 6 months.
2. In addition:
(a) Where the party seeks child custody, the affidavit shall specify a visitation schedule for the defaulting party and the child.
(b) Where the party seeks to deny visitation between the child and the defaulting party, the affidavit shall include:
(1) The reasons visitation should be denied;
(2) The last time the defaulting party contacted or visited the child; and
(3) The last known address and whereabouts of the defaulting party.
(c) Where the party seeks supervised visitation between the child and the defaulting party, the affidavit shall specify:
(1) The reasons visitation should be supervised;
(2) When and where supervised visitation shall take place; and
(3) The person or agency who shall supervise the visitation.
(d) As an alternative to (b) and (c), above, the party may request that the matter be referred to family division mediation.
History
[Amended; effective January 1, 2020.]
Provenance
- Source
- leg.state.nv.us
- Retrieved
- 2026-09-24
- Edition
- 2026-09-24
- Content hash
985061939866f0501f9706c4f48e4e1d9d39b597cebb6d13b7fc85f4fe6db233
The link goes to the issuing authority’s own document — the one we read to produce this record. Where a source publishes whole titles rather than sections, your browser may need a moment to jump to the provision.
Unofficial copy of government-published law, reproduced from official sources with full provenance. Not an official publication; verify against official sources before relying on it in a filing. Records in the 'guidance' corpus, and only that corpus, are sub-regulatory (interpretive guidelines, survey procedures) and are not binding law. Validity bounds follow each jurisdiction's declared temporalBasis.