NV · rules
NJDCR 32.3
Review of electronic filing for nonconformance
(a) In accordance with the NEFCR, an electronic document that does not comply with applicable filing requirements is a nonconforming document.
(b) Absent a court order directing otherwise, a filer shall have the time period allowed within the NEFCR to cure a nonconformity after notification by the Court Clerk or NJDCEFS regarding nonconformance.
(c) The Court Clerk is authorized to strike without prior court authorization any of the following nonconforming documents:
(1) Proposed jury instructions;
(2) An electronic document filed in the wrong case;
(3) Unauthorized notice of hearing, regardless of format;
(4) Bundled documents filed as one document to commence a civil action;
(5) A document barred from electronic filing as set forth within NJDCR 32.2(b) or the NEFCR; or
(6) A document not in conformance with all applicable filing requirements for a paper document or the requirements set forth within NJDCR 32.2(a) or the NEFCR.
(d) The court may strike any other electronic document not specified immediately above for nonconformance.
(e) Failure to pay a fee or fees associated with a specific filing does not constitute nonconformance; absent a fee waiver obtained by the filer in advance, the NJDCEFS will bar completion of an electronic submission into the NJDCEFS based upon a failure to concurrently pay any fee associated with the specific filing.
History
[Added; effective June 30, 2025.]
Provenance
- Source
- leg.state.nv.us
- Retrieved
- 2026-09-24
- Edition
- 2026-09-24
- Content hash
e70b87f9f89c33fd366e6f232c142c37b588375edfa40acb2a89cf4b236325ca
The link goes to the issuing authority’s own document — the one we read to produce this record. Where a source publishes whole titles rather than sections, your browser may need a moment to jump to the provision.
Unofficial copy of government-published law, reproduced from official sources with full provenance. Not an official publication; verify against official sources before relying on it in a filing. Records in the 'guidance' corpus, and only that corpus, are sub-regulatory (interpretive guidelines, survey procedures) and are not binding law. Validity bounds follow each jurisdiction's declared temporalBasis.