NV · rules
FJDCR 4.3
Setting family case hearings and trials
(a) When set. Family case hearings and trials will be set during the case management conference, or by order upon the court’s own initiative, upon motion or stipulation.
(b) Procedure. The parties must include in their case management conference report and in any motion or stipulation for a hearing or trial how much time each party reasonably believes is needed for the hearing or trial based upon the factual issues and the number of witnesses and exhibits. The court may set reasonable time limits on the amount of time each party will have to present their case, including opening statement, direct examination, cross-examination, redirect examination, recross-examination if allowed, objections, and closing argument. An additional 30 minutes will be added to the hearing or trial time for court use. The parties will be required to complete each phase of the trial within the time allotted.
(c) Motion to increase time. If, after the hearing or trial date and time are set, either party believes the trial will take more time than allotted, the party may file a motion showing why the time allotted is not sufficient, including specific facts that were not known at the case management conference or at the time the motion or stipulation were filed, and how much additional time is requested. The motion must be supported by affidavit or declaration.
History
[Added; effective January 1, 2020; amended; effective June 23, 2023.]
Provenance
- Source
- leg.state.nv.us
- Retrieved
- 2026-09-24
- Edition
- 2026-09-24
- Content hash
8b6aaef3863b4cd81306ddb10dcc9050a93255c377304c20cc14351ce678a0a2
The link goes to the issuing authority’s own document — the one we read to produce this record. Where a source publishes whole titles rather than sections, your browser may need a moment to jump to the provision.
Unofficial copy of government-published law, reproduced from official sources with full provenance. Not an official publication; verify against official sources before relying on it in a filing. Records in the 'guidance' corpus, and only that corpus, are sub-regulatory (interpretive guidelines, survey procedures) and are not binding law. Validity bounds follow each jurisdiction's declared temporalBasis.