Bindinglaw

NV · rules

EDCR 5.706

Countersignatures and direct submission of orders

activein force · 2022-06-10 – presentact-effective-date

(a) Unless otherwise ordered:

(1) The party obtaining an order, judgment, or decree shall have 7 days to prepare it and request the countersignature of the opposing party as to its form and content.

(2) The opposing party shall then have 7 days to countersign or otherwise respond.

(b) Unless otherwise ordered, if unable to obtain the countersignature of the opposing party within 7 days, the drafting party may directly submit the proposed order to the court, copied to the opposing party, accompanied by an explanation of the attempts made to obtain the countersignature in substantially the following form:

(1) Enclosed please find our proposed Order from the __________________ hearing. Despite attempts to prepare a countersigned Order, we were unable to obtain a countersignature.

On [date], we sent our proposed order to the opposing party for review; we received no response. Despite a reminder letter on [date], the opposing party has not responded. We have attached the relevant correspondence.

Having reviewed the court minutes and the hearing recording, we believe the attached proposed Order complies with this court’s orders and so submit it without the signature of the opposing party.

Or:

(2) Enclosed please find our proposed Order from the __________________ hearing. Despite attempts to prepare a countersigned Order, we were unable to reach agreement with the opposing party. We have attached the relevant correspondence.

Having reviewed the court minutes and the hearing recording, we believe the attached proposed Order complies with this court’s orders and so submit it without the signature of the opposing party and have included the time indexes for the court’s convenience.

(c) If the parties are unable to agree on the form and content of a proposed order, and the drafting party directly submits a proposed order, the opposing party may submit a proposed alternative form of order, copied to the drafting party, within 7 days of submission of the first proposed order, accompanied by a brief explanation of the reason for the disagreement and the distinction between the proposed orders in substantially the following form:

The opposing party has submitted a proposed Order from the __________________ hearing. Having reviewed the court minutes and the hearing recording, we believe our attached proposed Order is more accurate than that of the opposing party and have included the time indexes for the court’s convenience.

History

[Amended; effective June 10, 2022.]

Provenance

Source
leg.state.nv.us
Retrieved
2026-09-24
Edition
2026-09-24
Content hash
30c7ec45063d606dea79600f113687c287b64de807501d5d13f6262ca9edc3ec
View the official source →

The link goes to the issuing authority’s own document — the one we read to produce this record. Where a source publishes whole titles rather than sections, your browser may need a moment to jump to the provision.

Unofficial copy of government-published law, reproduced from official sources with full provenance. Not an official publication; verify against official sources before relying on it in a filing. Records in the 'guidance' corpus, and only that corpus, are sub-regulatory (interpretive guidelines, survey procedures) and are not binding law. Validity bounds follow each jurisdiction's declared temporalBasis.

Coverage · API docs

Bindinglaw

Point-in-time US law with the receipt attached. Source URL, retrieval time, content hash, and validity dates on every answer.

curl api.binding.law/v1/law/coverage

© 2026 binding.law · a Jubal, Inc. productAttorneys and firms never pay. Ever.