NV · rules
EDCR 4.17
Discovery in contested/litigated matters
(a) In contested matters before the probate commissioner involving disputed issues of material fact, the probate commissioner shall set an evidentiary hearing date and a discovery schedule after receiving input from the attorneys for the parties and any unrepresented parties. Such settings shall be made at the time of the hearing on the initial petition commencing the litigation or at the request of any party thereto. The probate commissioner may direct the parties to meet and confer for the purpose of developing a discovery plan, subject to the probate commissioner’s approval. In matters that have been transferred to the probate judge pursuant to EDCR 4.08, the probate judge may set the hearing date and a discovery schedule under this rule on its own initiative or at the request of any party.
(b) The probate commissioner or the probate judge may, as appropriate, limit the time to:
(1) Complete discovery obligations;
(2) Join other parties and to amend the pleadings; and
(3) File and hear dispositive motions.
(c) The probate commissioner or the probate judge, where appropriate, may set any additional deadlines provided for under NRCP 16 and 16.1 as deemed necessary or appropriate based on the nature and scope of the contested issues to be determined at the evidentiary hearing.
History
[Added; effective September 2, 2014; amended; effective June 25, 2024.]
Provenance
- Source
- leg.state.nv.us
- Retrieved
- 2026-09-24
- Edition
- 2026-09-24
- Content hash
659f597b9bc6da80c758769870a32f3b6aeb8504767c17cdf25d921a6a5775e1
The link goes to the issuing authority’s own document — the one we read to produce this record. Where a source publishes whole titles rather than sections, your browser may need a moment to jump to the provision.
Unofficial copy of government-published law, reproduced from official sources with full provenance. Not an official publication; verify against official sources before relying on it in a filing. Records in the 'guidance' corpus, and only that corpus, are sub-regulatory (interpretive guidelines, survey procedures) and are not binding law. Validity bounds follow each jurisdiction's declared temporalBasis.