NV · rules
EDCR 4.07
Judicial review by probate judge of probate commissioner’s reports and recommendations
(a) Judicial review of a final recommendation of the probate commissioner will be confined to the record, together with the specific written objections.
(b) On judicial review of cases concerning alleged irregularities in procedure of a contested probate matter heard by the probate commissioner that are not shown in the record, the probate judge may receive evidence concerning the alleged irregularities, including allegations of ex parte communications between the probate commissioner and a party or any other irregularities that would tend to diminish the public’s confidence in the court’s independence, impartiality, and/or integrity.
(c) Upon receipt of a probate commissioner’s report, request for judicial review, and any response and reply, the probate judge shall:
(1) Affirm, reverse, or modify the probate commissioner’s ruling, with or without oral argument in accordance with EDCR 2.23; or
(2) Remand the matter to the probate commissioner for reconsideration or further action.
(d) Pending the probate judge’s review of any objection to the probate commissioner’s report, parties shall refrain from taking any action inconsistent with the probate commissioner’s recommendations, unless otherwise ordered by the probate judge. The probate judge may affirmatively enforce the probate commissioner’s recommendation pending the probate judge’s review.
History
[Added; effective September 2, 2014; amended; effective June 25, 2024.]
Provenance
- Source
- leg.state.nv.us
- Retrieved
- 2026-09-24
- Edition
- 2026-09-24
- Content hash
3df5c20892c6eea24a4f067c77eb6d117d639227e5fc41ede7f03d5a06890a87
The link goes to the issuing authority’s own document — the one we read to produce this record. Where a source publishes whole titles rather than sections, your browser may need a moment to jump to the provision.
Unofficial copy of government-published law, reproduced from official sources with full provenance. Not an official publication; verify against official sources before relying on it in a filing. Records in the 'guidance' corpus, and only that corpus, are sub-regulatory (interpretive guidelines, survey procedures) and are not binding law. Validity bounds follow each jurisdiction's declared temporalBasis.