Bindinglaw

NV · rules

EDCR 1.33

Specialization of judges; procedure for selection

activein force · 2024-06-25 – presentact-effective-date

The chief judge may assign the judges of the district to specialized case types in the court for 2-year terms as needed. The assignments may provide for rotation of the judges among the various case types. In making the assignments, the chief judge shall request the district judges to recommend the assignments and shall take into account the desires of each individual judge. However, the final selection is left to the discretion of the chief judge. Assignments may be made as follows:

(a) Civil, criminal: judges as needed;

(b) Business court: at least 3 judges who have experience as a judge or practitioner in “business matters” as defined in EDCR 1.61(a);

(c) Constructional defects: judges as needed;

(d) Drug court, mental health court, civil commitments, competency, TAP/OPEN, MAT veterans’ court, gambling court, DAAY court, etc.: judges as needed;

(e) Overflow: judges as needed;

(f) Family civil domestic: judges as needed;

(g) Family juvenile: judges as needed;

(h) Guardianship: judges as needed;

(i) Probate: judges as needed;

(j) Medical malpractice court or professional negligence: judges as needed; and

(k) Any other specialty assignments: judges as needed.

History

[Added; effective January 1, 2001; amended; effective June 25, 2024.]

Provenance

Source
leg.state.nv.us
Retrieved
2026-09-24
Edition
2026-09-24
Content hash
873def3c9e8017a6e3edda1459022cdb03ff79709ca92402cbfd2db6f95c5976
View the official source →

The link goes to the issuing authority’s own document — the one we read to produce this record. Where a source publishes whole titles rather than sections, your browser may need a moment to jump to the provision.

Unofficial copy of government-published law, reproduced from official sources with full provenance. Not an official publication; verify against official sources before relying on it in a filing. Records in the 'guidance' corpus, and only that corpus, are sub-regulatory (interpretive guidelines, survey procedures) and are not binding law. Validity bounds follow each jurisdiction's declared temporalBasis.

Coverage · API docs

Bindinglaw

Point-in-time US law with the receipt attached. Source URL, retrieval time, content hash, and validity dates on every answer.

curl api.binding.law/v1/law/coverage

© 2026 binding.law · a Jubal, Inc. productAttorneys and firms never pay. Ever.
EDCR 1.33 — Specialization of judges; procedure for s… · binding.law