NM · rules
N.M. Sup. Ct. Order No. S-1-AO-2026-00026
Order No. S-1-AO-2026-00026 In the Matter of Skills Based Pathway to Bar Licensure. Attest
P
age 1 of 3
IN THE SUPREME COURT OF THE STATE OF NEW MEXICO 1
July 30, 2026 2
NO. S-1-AO-2026-00026 3
IN THE MATTER OF THE ADOPTION OF 4
A SKILLS-BASED PATHWAY TO BAR 5
LICENSURE 6
ORDER 7
WHEREAS, this matter came on for consideration upon recommendation of the 8
New Mexico Supreme Court Bar Licensure and Rural Access to Justice Executive 9
Committee (“Committee”) to consider the adoption of a skill s-based pathway to bar 10
licensure in New Mexico; 11
WHEREAS, in June 2026, the Committee submitted its report to the Supreme 12
Court with a number of recommendations to address alternative pathways to licensure 13
in New Mexico, see attached Report and Recommendations of the New Mexico 14
Supreme Court Bar Licensure and Rural Access to Justice Executive Committee; 15
WHEREAS, the Committee concludes that the current exam-based pathway does 16
not adequately assess the full range of skills necessary for the practice of law in New 17
Mexico and creates barriers for oth erwise qualified candidates, and imposes financial 18
burdens on those candidates at a time when New Mexico faces a shortage of attorneys; 19
Filed
Supreme Court of New Mexico
7/30/2026 4:14 PM
Office of the Clerk
1 WHEREAS, to address these inadequacies, barriers, and unmet legal needs, the
2 Committee recommends adopting a skills-based pathway to bar licensure in New
3 Mexico, in addition to the current bar exam-based pathway; and
4 WHEREAS, the Court having considered the recommendation and being
5 sufficiently advised, Chief Justice Julie J. Vargas, Justice Michael E. Vigil, Justice C.
6 Shannon Bacon, Justice David K. Thomson, and Justice Briana H. Zamora concurring;
7 NOW, THEREFORE, IT IS ORDERED that the Committee’s recommendations
8 as set forth in the report are APPROVED;
9 IT IS FURTHER ORDERED that a skills-based pathway to licensure, in addition
10 to the current bar exam-based pathway, is adopted and shall commence upon further
11 order of the Court;
12 IT IS FURTHER ORDERED that a subcommittee (Subcommittee) to the
13 Alternative Pathways to Licensure Ad Hoc Committee is hereby formed consisting of
14 the following individuals, who shall be charged with the development of forms,
15 trainings, and rubrics for the skills-based pathway that are consistent with the
16 recommendations in the report and that shall be submitted to the Court for approval:
17 1. Chief Justice Julie J. Vargas
18 2. Justice C. Shannon Bacon
19 3. Ann L. Keith, General Counsel to the Chief Justice
20 4. Camille Pedrick, Executive Director of the Board of Bar Examiners
P
age 3 of 3
5. Deborah Jones Merritt, Professor, Ohio State University 1
6. Serge Martinez, Associate Dean of Experiential Learning, UNM SOL2
7. Torri Jacobus, Director of Statewide Equity, Inclusion, & Justice, AOC3
8. Arlene Baca, Statewide Training Coordinator, AOC CEI4
9. David Stout, Professor, UNM SOL5
10. Elizabeth Holmes, Training & Recruitment Director, NM LOPD6
11. Royce Deller, Esq.7
IT IS FURTHER ORDERED that the Board of Bar Examiners shall present 8
proposed rule amendments, in accordance with Rule 23-106.1 NMRA, that implement 9
the skills-based pathway consistent with the recommendations in the attached report; 10
IT IS FURTHER ORDERED that the Subcommittee shall recommend an 11
implementation date for the skills-based pathway to licensure. 12
IT IS SO ORDERED. 13
WITNESS, the Honorable Julie J. Vargas, Chief Justice of 15
the Supreme Court of the State of New Mexico, and the 16
seal of said Court this 30th day of July, 2026. 17
El izabeth A. Garcia, Chief Clerk of the Supreme Court 19
of the State of New Mexico 20
Provenance
- Source
- supremecourt.nmcourts.gov
- Retrieved
- 2026-09-30
- Edition
- 2026-09-30
- Content hash
3cda427ad8441eff2a51313788e420c2a2dc36b6edcead8badc00915226b92e0
The link goes to the issuing authority’s own document — the one we read to produce this record. Where a source publishes whole titles rather than sections, your browser may need a moment to jump to the provision.
Unofficial copy of government-published law, reproduced from official sources with full provenance. Not an official publication; verify against official sources before relying on it in a filing. Records in the 'guidance' corpus, and only that corpus, are sub-regulatory (interpretive guidelines, survey procedures) and are not binding law. Validity bounds follow each jurisdiction's declared temporalBasis.