Bindinglaw

NM · rules

N.M. Sup. Ct. Order No. 23-8500-004

Order No. 23-8500-004 Authorizing Remote Voir Dire Pilot Programs 1.30.23

activein force · 2026-09-30 – presentact-effective-date

IN THE SUPREME COURT OF THE STATE OF NEW MEXICO 1

January 30, 2023 2

NO. 23-8500-004 3

IN THE MATTER OF THE 4

APPROVAL OF A REMOTE VOIR DIRE 5

PILOT PROGRAM IN THE EIGHTH JUDICIAL 6

DISTRICT COURT AND THE BERNALILLO 7

COUNTY METROPOLITAN COURT 8

ORDER 10

WHEREAS, on December 9, 2022, this Court issued Order No. 22-8500-11

037 to, among other things, amend the New Mexico Judiciary’s Emergency Court 12

Protocol No. 2 (A)(1), which states all hearings, including trials…shall be held in a 13

manner that limits the number of individuals in a single room or connected space – 14

which includes judges, court personnel, jurors, attorneys, litigants, the press, and 15

the general public – to allow for appropriate social distancing; 16

WHEREAS, the order also requires in Protocol No. 2 (B)(1) that all criminal 17

and civil jury trials shall proceed in person, and in Protocol No. 2 (B)(9) that 18

except as provided in Subsections (B)(1) -(8) of this Protocol, the presumption is 19

that all other court proceedings shall be conducted remotely through audio-video 20

connection for court appearances by all attorneys, litigants, and witnesses, unless 21

the judge presiding over the proceeding, in consultation with the chief judge of the 22

judicial district, orders otherwise; 1

WHEREAS, in light of the anticipated value of ordering only those jurors 2

who have been selected through voir dire for jury service before entering a 3

courtroom in person to reduce the number of persons in a courtroom, and reduce 4

the cost of travel and time for prospective jurors, conducting voir dire remotely in 5

jury trials will be implemented in two New Mexico courtrooms for purposes of a 6

remote voir dire pilot program; and 7

WHEREAS, in light of the foregoing, and the Court wishing to authorize the 8

implementation of a remote voir dire pilot program in certain courts with certain 9

judges, for a limited time to determine whether the Court will approve the use of 10

remote voir dire on a statewide basis by New Mexico state courts being 11

sufficiently advised; Chief Justice C. Shannon Bacon, J ustice Michael E. Vigil, 12

Justice David K. Thomson, Justice Julie J. Vargas, and Justice Brianna H. Zamora 13

concurring; 14

NOW, THEREFORE, IT IS ORDERED that the recommendation to 15

implement pilot programs in the Eight h Judicial District Court, limited to Chief 16

Judge Emilio Chavez’ s Courtroom, and in the Bernalillo County Metropolitan 17

Court, limited to Judge Asra I. Elliot’s Courtroom is APPROVED; 18

IT IS FURTHER ORDERED that the AOC shall provide periodic updates to 19

the Supreme Court with regard to the operation of the Remote Voir Dire Pilot 1

Program and shall submit an interim written report to the Supreme Court on or 2

before December 30, 20 23, that includes an assessment of the effectiveness of the 3

Remote Voir Dire Pilot Project and any recommendations for the con tinued use of 4

remote voir dire in New Mexico state courts; 5

IT IS SO ORDERED. 6

WITNESS, the Honorable C. Shannon Bacon, Chief

Justice of the Supreme Court of the State of New

Mexico, and the seal of said Court this 30th day of

January, 2023.

Provenance

Source
supremecourt.nmcourts.gov
Retrieved
2026-09-30
Edition
2026-09-30
Content hash
64b1abe3e2105056d6ec22bb9de241cec799ca01572651a62e3bf42bdabcbc11
View the official source →

The link goes to the issuing authority’s own document — the one we read to produce this record. Where a source publishes whole titles rather than sections, your browser may need a moment to jump to the provision.

Unofficial copy of government-published law, reproduced from official sources with full provenance. Not an official publication; verify against official sources before relying on it in a filing. Records in the 'guidance' corpus, and only that corpus, are sub-regulatory (interpretive guidelines, survey procedures) and are not binding law. Validity bounds follow each jurisdiction's declared temporalBasis.

Coverage · API docs

Bindinglaw

Point-in-time US law with the receipt attached. Source URL, retrieval time, content hash, and validity dates on every answer.

curl api.binding.law/v1/law/coverage

© 2026 binding.law · a Jubal, Inc. productAttorneys and firms never pay. Ever.