NM · rules
N.M. Sup. Ct. Order No. 22-8500-040
Order No. 22-8500-040 In the Matter of Briefing Deadlines for the Law Offices of the Public Defender and Office of the Attorney General 12.30.22
1 IN THE SUPREME COURT OF THE STATE OF NEW MEXICO
2 December 30, 2022
3 NO. 22-8500-040
4 IN THE MATTER OF BRIEFING
5 DEADLINES FOR THE LAW OFFICES OF
6 THE PUBLIC DEFENDER AND OFFICE
7 OF THE ATTORNEY GENERAL
8 ORDER
9 WHEREAS, the Law Offices of the Public Defender informed the Court via
10 letter dated December 6, 2022, of a significant case overload as a result of a
11 combination of factors, including a large number of attorney vacancies, lack of
12 contract counsel, and increased duties for appellate defenders;
13 WHEREAS, the Court met with representatives from the Law Offices of the
14 Public Defender and the Office of the Attorney General to discuss briefing deadlines
15 under the Rules of Appellate Procedure for cases in which the parties to the
16 proceeding were represented by the Law Offices of the Public Defender and Office
17 of the Attorney General, which resulted in general agreement that an automatic
18 extension order would be in the best interest of judicial efficiency; and
19 WHEREAS, in light of the foregoing, and the Court having concluded that it
20 would be appropriate to provide for automatic extensions of briefing deadlines
21 consistent with the agreement of the representatives, and being otherwise
sufficiently advised, Chief Justice C. Shannon Bacon, Justice Michael E. Vigil, 1
Justice David K. Thomson, Justice Julie J. Vargas, and Justice Briana H. Zamora 2
concurring; 3
NOW, THEREFORE, IT IS ORDERED that the following policy is hereby 4
ADOPTED and shall apply to al l cases in which the parties are represented by the 5
Law Offices of the Public Defender and the Office of the Attorney General; 6
1. For all cases in which a general calendar notice is filed on or after 7
January 3, 2023, and only in cases in which the appellant is represented 8
by the Law Offices of the Public Defender, the forty-five (45) -day 9
deadline for filing briefs in chief under Rule 12-210(C)(2) NMRA shall 10
be replaced with a one hundred twenty (120) day-deadline. Any 11
request for additional time beyond the one hundred twenty (120) days 12
must be filed by the assigned attorney, will be viewed with disfavor, 13
and must present exceptional circumstances other than the normal press 14
of business; 15
2. For all cases in which a briefing schedule is filed on or after January 3, 16
2023, and only in cases in which the petitioner is represented by the 17
Law Offices of the Public Defender, the brief in chief shall be due in 18
one hundred twenty (120) days. Any request for additional time 19
beyond the one hundred twenty (120) days must be filed by the assigned 20
attorney, will be viewed with disfavor, and must present exceptional 21
circumstances other than the normal press of business; 22
3. For all cases in which a general calendar notice is filed on or af ter 23
January 3, 2023, briefs in chief in cases in which the appellant is 24
represented by the Office of the Attorney G eneral, answer briefs filed 25
by either appellant or appellee, and reply briefs filed by either appellant 26
or appellee shall be due in accordance with the regular deadlines under 27
Rule 12-210(C)(2) NMRA; 28
4. For all cases in which a briefing order is filed on or after January 3, 1
2023, briefs in chief in cases in which the petitioner is represented by 2
the Office of the Attorney General, answer briefs fi led by either 3
petitioner or respondent, and reply briefs filed by either petitioner or 4
respondent shall be due in accordance with the deadlines provided in 5
the briefing order; 6
5. For all cases in which a general calendar notice or a briefing order is 7
filed in a cross appeal or in cases in which a cross petition for writ of 8
certiorari has been granted, the deadline for the briefs in chief shall be 9
one hundred twenty (120) days from either the filing of the general 10
calendar notice or from the filing of the briefing order; 11
IT IS FURTHER ORDERED that all cases in which contract counsel is 13
substituted in place of the Law Offices of the Public Defender shall continue to 14
proceed in accordance with the regular briefing deadlines and procedures set forth 15
in the Rules of Appellate Procedure and in any briefing orders issued by this Court; 16
IT IS FURTHER ORDERED t hat briefing in all other cases by the Law 17
Offices of the Public Defender and Office of the Attorney General shall proceed in 18
accordance with the Rules of Appellate Procedure or as otherwise ordered by the 19
Court; 20
IT IS FURTHER ORDERED that cases subject to this order shall be stayed 21
for the length of extra time the Law Offices of the Public Defender has to brief its 22
cases under the policy set forth above, so that the standing extensions do not affect 23
the Court’s performance measures; and 24
IT IS FURTHER ORDERED that representatives shall update the Chief Clerk 1
of Court and the Chief Deputy Clerk of Court about the continued need for a standing 2
extension order in six (6) months from the date of this order, and every six (6) months 3
thereafter, for as long as this order remains in effect. 4
IT IS SO ORDERED. 5
WITNESS, the Honorable C. Shannon Bacon, Chief 6
Justice of the Supreme Court of the State of New Mexico, 7
and the seal of said Court this 30th day of December 2022. 8
Provenance
- Source
- supremecourt.nmcourts.gov
- Retrieved
- 2026-09-30
- Edition
- 2026-09-30
- Content hash
5d401ab0dbb74aeb92991ca7e04fc19fbb38b9bcd49a074b483f256c9beb1ef7
The link goes to the issuing authority’s own document — the one we read to produce this record. Where a source publishes whole titles rather than sections, your browser may need a moment to jump to the provision.
Unofficial copy of government-published law, reproduced from official sources with full provenance. Not an official publication; verify against official sources before relying on it in a filing. Records in the 'guidance' corpus, and only that corpus, are sub-regulatory (interpretive guidelines, survey procedures) and are not binding law. Validity bounds follow each jurisdiction's declared temporalBasis.