Bindinglaw

NM · rules

N.M. Sup. Ct. Order No. 22-8500-024

Order No. 22-8500-024 Order Reinstating Order No. 20-8500-024 (signed)

activein force · 2026-09-30 – presentact-effective-date

IN THE SUPREME COURT OF THE STATE OF NEW MEXICO 1

May 25, 2022 2

NO. 22-8500-024 3

IN THE MATTER OF DISCONTINUING 4

THE USE OF COURTCALL AND 5

SIMILAR SERVICES FOR ALL 6

COURT PROCEEDINGS 7

ORDER 9

WHEREAS, in Order No. 20-8500-024, the Court ordered that on September 10

1, 2020, all New Mexico courts shall discontinue the use of CourtCall or other 11

similar services that require the parties to pay a fee for the service for all court 12

proceedings; and 13

WHEREAS, the Court having considered the recommendation to reinstate 14

Order No. 20-8500-024, and being sufficiently advised, Chief Justice C. Shannon 15

Bacon, Justice Michael E. Vigil, Justice David K. Thomson, Justice Julie J. Vargas, 16

and Justice Briana H. Zamora concurring; 17

NOW, THEREFORE, IT IS ORDERED that Order No. 20-8500-024 is 18

hereby reinstated; and 19

IT IS FURTHER ORDERED that New Mexico courts shall not use telephonic 20

and/or audio-video methods for court proceedings that require the parties to pay a 21

fee for the service, e.g. CourtCall and other similar services, until further action by 1

this Court; 2

IT IS SO ORDERED. 3

WITNESS, the Honorable C. Shannon Bacon, Chief 4

Justice of the Supreme Court of the State of New Mexico, 5

and the seal of said Court this 25th day of May, 2022. 6

( S E A L ) 7

Provenance

Source
supremecourt.nmcourts.gov
Retrieved
2026-09-30
Edition
2026-09-30
Content hash
3ba6726bac64bf88adbdedb5f7c28e3484f1d9e15407471eca10c738f8d00b83
View the official source →

The link goes to the issuing authority’s own document — the one we read to produce this record. Where a source publishes whole titles rather than sections, your browser may need a moment to jump to the provision.

Unofficial copy of government-published law, reproduced from official sources with full provenance. Not an official publication; verify against official sources before relying on it in a filing. Records in the 'guidance' corpus, and only that corpus, are sub-regulatory (interpretive guidelines, survey procedures) and are not binding law. Validity bounds follow each jurisdiction's declared temporalBasis.

Coverage · API docs

Bindinglaw

Point-in-time US law with the receipt attached. Source URL, retrieval time, content hash, and validity dates on every answer.

curl api.binding.law/v1/law/coverage

© 2026 binding.law · a Jubal, Inc. productAttorneys and firms never pay. Ever.