NM · rules
N.M. Jud. Standards Comm'n Rule 6
CONFIDENTIALITY AND PRIVILEGE
A. Requirements of the Constitution. As provided in Article VI, Section 32 of the
Constitution:
(1) All meetings of the Commission and all hearings on the merits and all
other proceedings before the Commission, presiding officers, and masters are confidential.
(2) All pleadings and other documents filed with the Commission, or with
presiding officers and masters appointed by the Commission, or by the chair, are confidential.
(3) All testimony given before the Commission, presiding officers, and
masters is confidential.
(4) All testimony given in depositions and recorded statements permitted by
these rules is confidential.
(5) A record of proceedings filed by the Commission with the Supreme
Court remains privileged but, upon filing, is no longer confidential.
(6) A writing which was privileged before it was filed with the Commission
or its masters does not lose its privilege by filing with the Supreme Court.
(7) Promptly upon their appointment, masters shall be informed of the
confidentiality of all proceedings undertaken by them and shall agree to keep such proceedings
confidential.
B. Applicability. This rule about confidentiality applies to:
(1) Witnesses in an investigation and witnesses at a hearing on the merits.
(2) The Commission, general counsel, investigative trial counsel, staff,
expert witnesses, and consultants retained by general counsel.
(3) A judge and judge’s counsel and staff, expert witnesses, consultants
retained by the judge, and guardians ad litem appointed pursuant to Rule 25.
(4) The record of proceedings of a hearing on the merits loses confidentiality
upon filing with the Supreme Court, but only to the extent of the filing. The record of any other
Commission proceeding filed with the Supreme Court loses confidentiality only upon order of
the Supreme Court and then only to the extent of the filing.
C. Third Party Complainant Exempt. A person filing a third party complaint is
not prohibited from communicating to others about the filing of the third party complaint, its
contents, or complainant’s testimony related thereto.
D. Confidentiality During Investigation. In connection with the investigation
of allegations in a notice of investigation or charges in a notice of formal proceedings, the
parties may disclose to third parties the existence of a notice of investigation or a notice of
formal proceedings, but only to the extent necessary to conduct the investigation.
E. Waiver Under Certain Circumstances. A judge applying for a position that
requires a background check may, in a sworn, written document filed with the Commission,
waive confidentiality regarding the judge’s disciplinary history. Upon approval by the
Commission, the general counsel shall issue a letter of certification as applicable:
(1) That the judge has no history of non-disciplinary or disciplinary action.
(2) That the judge has a history of docketed complaints with the Commission
that resulted in either non-disciplinary or disciplinary action against the judge.
(3) If the judge has a history of docketed complaints with the Commission
that resulted in disciplinary action by the Supreme Court, the background investigators shall be
referred to the Supreme Court for the public portion of the record.
F. Commission Exceptions. For good cause, the Commission may disclose
otherwise confidential information to the Supreme Court, law enforcement agencies, State
Auditor, Attorney General, Supreme Court Disciplinary Board, or others.
G. Third Party Support. The parties may disclose otherwise confidential
information to third parties necessary to perform the work to prepare cases for investigation and
hearing on the merits including, without limitation, to court reporters and videographers,
investigators, consultants, expert witnesses, and special counsel; provided, however, except at a
hearing on the merits, and subject to the Rules of Evidence, that neither investigative trial
counsel nor a judge shall disclose to a witness information provided either orally or in writing
by another witness. All such persons to whom such otherwise confidential information is to be
disclosed shall be informed in advance of the confidentiality of such information and shall agree
in a writing approved by the Commission to keep such information confidential upon penalty of
contempt of the Commission.
H. Disclosure of Third Party Complainant and Complaint. Notwithstanding any
other provisions of this rule, neither the identity of a third party complainant, nor a third party
complaint shall be provided to a judge; provided, however, that if investigative trial counsel
intends to call a third party complainant as a witness at a hearing on the merits, the identity of a
third party complainant shall be disclosed to the judge as a witness as provided by Rule 17,
below, and the third party complaint shall be produced to the judge.
I. Witnesses. Except for a third party complainant, all witnesses giving
testimony, either in deposition or in a hearing on the merits, shall take an oath approved by the
Commission to keep the existence of any proceeding against a judge and the identity of such
judge confidential until the proceeding is no longer confidential under these rules.
J. Privilege. The filing of papers and giving of testimony before the
Commission or its masters is privileged in any action for defamation, except that the record
filed by the Commission in the Supreme Court continues privileged but, upon its filing, loses its
confidential character, and a writing that was privileged prior to its filing with the Commission
or its masters does not lose its privilege by the filing.
Provenance
- Source
- www.nmjsc.org
- Retrieved
- 2026-09-30
- Edition
- 2026-09-30
- Content hash
3f2530bb858428b776f4d212220b464ee6a79a9ee0ebf5c0597e44f4d1f0de3d
The link goes to the issuing authority’s own document — the one we read to produce this record. Where a source publishes whole titles rather than sections, your browser may need a moment to jump to the provision.
Unofficial copy of government-published law, reproduced from official sources with full provenance. Not an official publication; verify against official sources before relying on it in a filing. Records in the 'guidance' corpus, and only that corpus, are sub-regulatory (interpretive guidelines, survey procedures) and are not binding law. Validity bounds follow each jurisdiction's declared temporalBasis.