NM · rules
N.M. Jud. Standards Comm'n Rule 35
NON-DISCIPLINARY DISPOSITION
At any time in the proceedings after service of a notice of investigation, filing of the judge’s
response, and an invitation to a conference with the Commission, the Commission may close
the proceedings with one or more of the following:
A. Advisory Letter. The Commission may issue a letter advising the judge that
the matters alleged in a complaint may constitute grounds for discipline, removal, or retirement
as follows:
(1) At least fifteen (15) days before the Commission issues an advisory letter,
the Commission shall notify the judge of its intent to do so and shall provide the judge with a
copy of the proposed advisory letter. The notice shall inform the judge that, if an advisory letter
is issued, the advisory letter, the judge’s response, and the record of any hearing thereon may be
used in a subsequent proceeding pursuant to Rule 32(C)(4), above.
(2) If, within fifteen (15) days of service of notice of intent to issue an
advisory letter, the judge does not object in writing to the Commission, the Commission may
issue the letter as proposed.
(3) If, within fifteen (15) days of service of notice of intent to issue an
advisory letter, the judge objects thereto, the judge may:
(a) File objections to the proposed advisory letter with the
Commission in writing
(b) Request to be heard before the Commission on the objections.
(4) If the judge requests a hearing on objections to an advisory letter:
(a) The Chair shall appoint a presiding officer, who is a District
Judge, to conduct the hearing.
(b) The hearing shall be limited to statements of the judge, the
judge’s counsel and investigative trial counsel, and documents which have been disclosed.
(c) No witnesses will be called.
(d) At the completion of the hearing, the Commission shall take the
matter under advisement, shall decide on the objections in closed session, and then announce
the decision in the presence of the judge and the investigative trial counsel.
(5) Following a hearing on the judge’s objections or receipt of the judge’s
written objections, the Commission may take any of the following actions:
(a) Issue the advisory letter as proposed.
(b) Modify and issue the advisory letter.
(c) Dismiss the complaint without issuing an advisory letter.
(d) Order additional investigation.
(e) Approve a notice of formal proceedings, if a notice of formal
proceedings has not been issued.
(f) Set the complaint for a hearing on the merits, if a notice of formal
proceedings has been served upon the judge.
(6) If the Commission issues an advisory letter and the judge has objected,
the judge’s objections and a record of any hearing held thereon shall be filed with the advisory
letter and shall be provided to the Commission in any subsequent proceeding in which the
advisory letter is used.
B. Other Remedial Measures. If the judge stipulates in a writing agreed to by
investigative trial counsel and approved by the Commission, the Commission may order the
judge to:
(1) Enter a period of mentoring with a mentor assigned by the Commission.
(2) Undertake training assigned by the Commission.
(3) Undergo counseling as assigned by the Commission.
(4) Participate in any other non-disciplinary action agreed to by the
Commission and the judge.
(5) Enter a period of probation upon terms set forth by the Commission in
conjunction with any of the measures set forth above.
(6) Participate and complete any combination of the above.
(7) Pay any third party costs associated with the stipulated remedial
measures.
C. Other Non-Disciplinary Action. The Commission may order any other non-disciplinary action.
Provenance
- Source
- www.nmjsc.org
- Retrieved
- 2026-09-30
- Edition
- 2026-09-30
- Content hash
1993f9e5d9c3f04a64a6829529aacece69cbe7b0ce23850987c228ad53557dbc
The link goes to the issuing authority’s own document — the one we read to produce this record. Where a source publishes whole titles rather than sections, your browser may need a moment to jump to the provision.
Unofficial copy of government-published law, reproduced from official sources with full provenance. Not an official publication; verify against official sources before relying on it in a filing. Records in the 'guidance' corpus, and only that corpus, are sub-regulatory (interpretive guidelines, survey procedures) and are not binding law. Validity bounds follow each jurisdiction's declared temporalBasis.