NM · rules
N.M. Jud. Standards Comm'n Rule 17
INITIAL DISCLOSURES
A. Disclosures Made.
(1) Investigative Trial Counsel’s Disclosures. Except as set forth below,
investigative trial counsel shall serve the judge with initial disclosures as follows:
(a) Invitation to Conference with the Commission. If, after a judge’s
response to a notice of investigation is received, and the Commission does not dismiss the
complaint or order additional investigation, then it shall invite the judge to a conference with the
Commission as set forth in Rule 19, and initial disclosures shall be served upon the judge with
the invitation.
(b) Notice of Formal Proceedings in Lieu of Notice of Investigation. If
the Commission, in lieu of a notice of investigation, issues a notice of formal proceedings,
initial disclosures shall be served with the notice of formal proceedings.
(c) Petition for Immediate Temporary Suspension. If the Commission,
along with a notice of investigation or a notice of formal proceedings, also authorizes a petition
to the Supreme Court for an order of immediate temporary suspension, initial disclosures shall
be served upon the judge along with the petition.
(d) No Disclosures. If, following the judge’s response to a notice of
investigation, the Commission dismisses the complaint, no disclosures are required.
(2) Judge’s Disclosures.
(a) If investigative trial counsel’s initial disclosures were served with
an invitation to a conference with the Commission, then the judge’s initial disclosures shall be
due within ten (10) days of such service.
(b) If investigative trial counsel’s initial disclosures were served with
a notice of formal proceedings, then the judge’s initial disclosures shall be due with the judge’s
response to the notice of formal proceedings.
(c) If investigative trial counsel’s initial disclosures were
served with a petition for immediate temporary suspension, then the judge’s initial disclosures
shall be due within twenty-one (21) days of such service.
(d) Upon motion and good cause shown, the time for the judge’s
initial disclosures may be extended.
B. Required Disclosures. The parties shall each provide to the other initial
disclosures containing:
(1) The name, address, telephone number, and other information sufficient to
identify and contact each witness likely to have information relevant to the allegations
contained in a notice of investigation or charges in a notice of formal proceedings and the
defenses thereto along with the subject matter of that information.
(2) All documents, electronically-stored information, and tangible things
relevant to the allegations in the notice of investigation or charges in a notice of formal
proceedings and the defenses thereto. Copies of all documents and electronically-stored
information in the possession or control of the disclosing party shall be provided to the other
party. The location of all documents and electronically-stored information and the location of
tangible things not in the possession and control of the disclosing party shall be disclosed to the
other party.
C. Continuing Obligation. The parties shall have a continuing obligation to
promptly supplement initial disclosures as additional information required by Section A of this
rule becomes known.
D. Privileges and Limitations. Except as otherwise set forth in Rule 23, below,
the privileges set forth in Rule 11-501, et seq. NMRA and the limitations set forth in Rule 1-026
NMRA shall apply to these initial disclosures. Communications between investigative trial
counsel and the Commission are excluded from production under this rule.
E. Third Party Complainant, Third Party Complaint Exempt. A third party
complainant or third party complaint shall not be disclosed and produced by investigative trial
counsel as required by Sections A and B, above; provided, however, that promptly after the
investigative trial counsel determines that a third party complainant may be called as a witness
at a hearing on the merits, disclosures and production shall be made.
F. Delayed Disclosures. Investigative trial counsel may apply to a presiding officer
for an order delaying disclosure of certain information required by Section A, above. The
presiding officer shall issue an order delaying disclosure of certain information upon a
particularized showing of good cause that disclosure at the time required by Rule 17 would
likely impede or imperil the ongoing investigation of the allegations in a notice of investigation
or charges in a notice of formal proceedings. The order shall specify a time for subsequent
disclosure or a time for review of the continuing appropriateness of the order.
G. Notice of Withheld Disclosures.
(1) If investigative trial counsel’s initial disclosures withhold the identity of
the third party complainant and production of the third party complaint, the initial disclosures
shall so state.
(2) If investigative trial counsel’s initial disclosures withhold other
information pursuant to an order of a presiding officer as set forth in Section F, above, the initial
disclosures shall so state and shall instead contain a short and plain statement of the evidence
expected to be adduced from withheld information sufficient to give the judge notice of what is
alleged, but also shielding the protected information.
H. Motion for Disclosures. If either investigative trial counsel or the judge believes
that additional disclosures should be made pursuant to this rule, then a motion shall be filed
requesting such disclosures.
Provenance
- Source
- www.nmjsc.org
- Retrieved
- 2026-09-30
- Edition
- 2026-09-30
- Content hash
934139bc22ea4df50eb9173e59f410a0c6d25f44f5e2c4456fdad8a0cf54893a
The link goes to the issuing authority’s own document — the one we read to produce this record. Where a source publishes whole titles rather than sections, your browser may need a moment to jump to the provision.
Unofficial copy of government-published law, reproduced from official sources with full provenance. Not an official publication; verify against official sources before relying on it in a filing. Records in the 'guidance' corpus, and only that corpus, are sub-regulatory (interpretive guidelines, survey procedures) and are not binding law. Validity bounds follow each jurisdiction's declared temporalBasis.