NM · rules
N.M. 3rd Jud. Dist. Court Interpreter Standards of Practice and Payment Policies 4
Assessment of Interpreting Need For Deaf Individuals Who Do Not Use Standard
American Sign Language
Severe hearing loss presents a complex combination of possible language and
communication barriers that traditional ASL/English interpreters are not trained to
assess, and it is not within their role to assess. If a deaf or hard of hearing person is
having trouble understanding a court interpreter and there is indication or
suspicion that the person needs other kinds of supports, a language assessment
may be requested by the Court. Conducted by a trained professional who is bi-
cultural and bi-lingual and has training in rehabilitation as well as disability/access
issues, the assessment shall involve, at a minimum, a face-to-face interview with
the person and a determination of what barriers to communication are present
and recommendations about supports that could be utilized, within ADA
Guidelines, to make access possible. An individual conducting such an
assessment should be able to provide documentation of his/her training and
experience in working with deaf or hard of hearing individuals who are not fluent
in American Sign Language which may be due to cognitive disabilities, emotional
or mental health issues, and/or because they primarily use another signed
language. Following the assessment, a recommendation shall be provided to the
Court regarding how best to provide due process for such an individual.
Provenance
- Source
- thirddistrict.nmcourts.gov
- Retrieved
- 2026-09-30
- Edition
- 2026-09-30
- Content hash
659e616fb66ecb95423f071291ad10a09ba0cd1a1306868e8bb986741433b6ae
The link goes to the issuing authority’s own document — the one we read to produce this record. Where a source publishes whole titles rather than sections, your browser may need a moment to jump to the provision.
Unofficial copy of government-published law, reproduced from official sources with full provenance. Not an official publication; verify against official sources before relying on it in a filing. Records in the 'guidance' corpus, and only that corpus, are sub-regulatory (interpretive guidelines, survey procedures) and are not binding law. Validity bounds follow each jurisdiction's declared temporalBasis.