NM · rules
N.M. 2nd Jud. Dist. Amended LR2-400-20160202 M
Special calendar; assignments and procedures; master calendar judge
All
criminal cases filed on or before June 30, 2014, shall by order of the chief judge be assigned or
reassigned to a special calendar. District court judges shall be assigned as special calendar
judges by separate order of the chief judge, who is authorized to reassign any district judge to be
a special calendar judge. Among the special calendar judges, the chief judge shall designate a
"master calendar" special calendar judge. Time limits and rules for disposition of cases assigned
or reassigned to special calendar judges shall be governed by the following:
(1) The master calendar judge shall request that the Second Judicial District
Attorney’s Office and Law Offices of the Public Defender assign attorneys to only special
calendar cases until the special calendar is concluded and any remaining special calendar cases
are absorbed into the new calendar. The master calendar judge shall request that attorneys
assigned by the Second Judicial District Attorney’s Office and Law Offices of the Public
Defender to the special calendar have authority to negotiate binding resolution of the special
calendar cases assigned to them;
(2) In consultation with the special calendar judges, the master calendar judge
shall assign all cases filed on or before June 30, 2014, among the special calendar judges as
follows:
(a) After assignment of a case to a special calendar judge, the judge
shall hold a status hearing as provided in Paragraph G of this rule. Before conclusion of the
status hearing, the special calendar judge shall enter an order establishing dates by which events
shall occur leading to resolution of the case. This order may, but is not required to, assign the
case to track 1, 2, or 3 as provided in Paragraph G of this rule; and
(b) No party shall acquire any right of peremptory excusal for cases
assigned to a special calendar judge. Unless a special calendar judge was excused prior to the
effective date of this rule, any special calendar judge may act in any case on the special calendar;
and
(3) The master calendar judge may establish, upon written approval of the
chief judge, any process for case assignment or reassignment that will result in the efficient
administration of cases on the special calendar. This may follow the process or a modification of
the process provided for in Paragraph G of this rule, may be a process similar to that proposed to
the Bernalillo County Criminal Justice Review Commission by the Law Offices of the Public
Defender, or may be otherwise. The process shall be established in writing and approved by the
chief judge as follows:
(a) The court shall provide reasonable notice of at least thirty (30) days
to special calendar case parties of assignment of the parties’ case to the special calendar and of
the process to be applied to special calendar cases; and
(b) The chief judge shall monitor progress of special calendar cases to
resolution. When in the determination of the chief judge there has been sufficient progress
toward disposition of a sufficient number of cases assigned to the special calendar, the chief
judge shall notify the Supreme Court and request modification of this rule. Modification shall
include reassignment of special calendar judges to the new calendar schedule, and may include
any changes to the new calendar process deemed appropriate based on the outcome of case
processing under the new calendar and special calendar processes.
Provenance
- Source
- seconddistrict.nmcourts.gov
- Retrieved
- 2026-09-30
- Edition
- 2026-09-30
- Content hash
d1b0f24706fd891e5e5c2db666e6f30bd218f434d0f826490aa00219388d4cfb
The link goes to the issuing authority’s own document — the one we read to produce this record. Where a source publishes whole titles rather than sections, your browser may need a moment to jump to the provision.
Unofficial copy of government-published law, reproduced from official sources with full provenance. Not an official publication; verify against official sources before relying on it in a filing. Records in the 'guidance' corpus, and only that corpus, are sub-regulatory (interpretive guidelines, survey procedures) and are not binding law. Validity bounds follow each jurisdiction's declared temporalBasis.