NM · rules
N.M. Ct. App. Policies & Procedures Manual VIII
CRITERIA FOR FORMAL AND MEMORANDUM OPINIONS AND
DISPOSITIONS BY DECISION OR ORDER
A. Memorandum opinions and dispositions by decision or order shall be
utilized in accordance with the criteria stated in Rule 12-405(B)
NMRA. Memorandum opinions and dispositions by decision or order
should contain background details and analysis only to the extent
necessary to adequately explain the Court’s reasoning and to
communicate to the parties that the Court understood their arguments.
Consistent with Rule 12-405(B), reliance on nonbinding authorities is
generally disfavored in memorandum opinions and dispositions by
decision or order.
B. Formal opinions shall be utilized when one or more of the issues therein
involve a matter of first impression in this jurisdiction or an overruling
of a prior decision of this Court or when the issuance of a formal
opinion would clarify the law for the bench and bar or would allow for
more efficient case processing of future cases, including on the
summary calendar. In considering whether a matter is of first
impression, great weight will be given to the fact that nonbinding
authorities are relied on to determine New Mexico law.
C. Although the author is expected to determine which type of opinion is
most appropriate, ultimately the majority on any panel will determine
whether the case will be decided by a memorandum or formal opinion
or by an order or decision.
Provenance
- Source
- coa.nmcourts.gov
- Retrieved
- 2026-09-30
- Edition
- 2026-09-30
- Content hash
4832da2f29867349111917fe11f0b1102da0bc66ecaee70ced9410687e440029
The link goes to the issuing authority’s own document — the one we read to produce this record. Where a source publishes whole titles rather than sections, your browser may need a moment to jump to the provision.
Unofficial copy of government-published law, reproduced from official sources with full provenance. Not an official publication; verify against official sources before relying on it in a filing. Records in the 'guidance' corpus, and only that corpus, are sub-regulatory (interpretive guidelines, survey procedures) and are not binding law. Validity bounds follow each jurisdiction's declared temporalBasis.