NM · rules
N.M. Ct. App. Policies & Procedures Manual VI
METHODOLOGY FOR RESOLUTION OF CASES
A. In accordance with NMSA 1978, Section 34-5-11 (1966), three judges
of the Court of Appeals shall constitute a quorum. Not more than three
judges shall sit in any matter on appeal. Formal opinions, memorandum
opinions, and decisions of the Court shall be in writing with the grounds
stated, and the result shall be concurred in by at least two judges.
B. If any judge who participated in a matter before the Court is unable to
participate in a rehearing, the chief clerk shall assign another judge to
sit thereon. See id.
C. Before a case is heard on oral argument, the authoring judge shall take
appropriate steps to let the panel know what the author believes the
main issues are warranting oral argument and if there is anything else
in particular the author believes the panel should review prior to oral
argument.
D. After a case is heard on oral argument, the panel shall retire and
immediately meet to discuss the proposed disposition.
E. Judges should strive to meet within two weeks of a request for a
precirculation panel conference. Before a case is conferenced, the
authoring or requesting judge shall take appropriate steps to let the
panel know what the author or requestor believes the main issues are
for conferencing and if there is anything else in particular the author or
requestor believes the panel should review prior to conferencing.
F. Cases remanded from the New Mexico Supreme Court to the Court of
Appeals for further proceedings shall be assigned to the same panel of
judges that originally heard the case. However, when a judge recuses
or is not available to hear a remanded case, the chief clerk will assign a
substitute judge on a random rotating basis.
G. The pendency of similar issues in the New Mexico Supreme Court shall
not ordinarily justify delaying a Court of Appeals decision. The panel
or calendaring judge may stay a particular case in unusual
circumstances while waiting for a Supreme Court decision to be issued.
H. Cases assigned to the expedited bench decision (EBD) program, see
Miscellaneous Order 01-57 (Sep. 19, 2016) or the most current version
of that order, shall be decided pursuant to that order.
Provenance
- Source
- coa.nmcourts.gov
- Retrieved
- 2026-09-30
- Edition
- 2026-09-30
- Content hash
5a6b211e4bfc044134956916c8d3bd3eb7cd4cb6131b04552222f4c265c4d96f
The link goes to the issuing authority’s own document — the one we read to produce this record. Where a source publishes whole titles rather than sections, your browser may need a moment to jump to the provision.
Unofficial copy of government-published law, reproduced from official sources with full provenance. Not an official publication; verify against official sources before relying on it in a filing. Records in the 'guidance' corpus, and only that corpus, are sub-regulatory (interpretive guidelines, survey procedures) and are not binding law. Validity bounds follow each jurisdiction's declared temporalBasis.