NM · rules
N.M. Ct. App. Policies & Procedures Manual IX
ORAL ARGUMENTS AND HEARINGS
A. A majority of the panel may set the case for oral argument. The clerk
shall notify the parties of the time, date, and location of the oral
argument. The notice shall disclose the names of the panel members in
order of seniority.
At each hearing for which the Court is convened, the panel shall be
presided over by the chief judge if he or she is a member of the panel,
or otherwise by the senior judge of the panel.
C. People who are interested in, but not parties to, a case governed by
Children’s Code confidentiality provisions may want to attend oral
arguments in such cases. The policy of the Court, based on NMSA
1978, Section 32A-1-17(A), is to follow NMSA 1978, Section 32A-4-
20(C), which provides that the Court may approve the attendance of
persons not parties, counsel, or witnesses provided that the Court finds
such persons to have a proper interest in the case or the work of the
Court and on condition that they refrain from divulging any information
that would identify the child or family involved in the proceedings. The
judge presiding over the oral argument shall take such steps as deemed
necessary to ensure the conditions upon which persons not parties or
counsel are allowed into the argument, including orally admonishing
those persons and orally accepting their agreement or doing the same
in writing, in the discretion of the presiding judge.
Provenance
- Source
- coa.nmcourts.gov
- Retrieved
- 2026-09-30
- Edition
- 2026-09-30
- Content hash
619239273730d39f3dc08fabcf4a44979e0475ed70c5b2508ef18822c0fec9fc
The link goes to the issuing authority’s own document — the one we read to produce this record. Where a source publishes whole titles rather than sections, your browser may need a moment to jump to the provision.
Unofficial copy of government-published law, reproduced from official sources with full provenance. Not an official publication; verify against official sources before relying on it in a filing. Records in the 'guidance' corpus, and only that corpus, are sub-regulatory (interpretive guidelines, survey procedures) and are not binding law. Validity bounds follow each jurisdiction's declared temporalBasis.