NM · rules
N.M. Judiciary NMdataXchange – Violation Policy v1.1
NMdataXchange – Violation Policy v1.1
Administrative Office of the Courts
Supreme Court of New Mexico
A
rthur W. Pepin, Director Judicial Information Division
202 E. Marcy St.
Cassandra Hayne
Judiciary Chief Technology Officer
Santa Fe, NM 87501
(505) 476-6900
(505) 476-6952 (fax)
www.nmcourts.gov
Online Access Subcommittee
Policy Regarding NM dataXchange Access Violations
A
ll violations of the terms and conditions of an individual’s application for
online access to New Mexico court case data are reviewed by the Online Access
Subcommittee (“OAS”) of the Judicial Information Systems Council (“JIFFY”).
Upon discovery of a violation of any of the terms and conditions set forth in the
Application for Online Access to New Mexico Judiciary Secure Court Case Data
in the NM dataXchange by any user, the following steps will be implemented:
1. T
he Judicial Information Division (“JID”) will immediately disable the NM
dataXchange access of the user violating the terms and conditions of the
NM dataXchange Application.
2. The user will be notified by the JID Chief Information Officer (“CIO”),
through the JID service desk ticket system, that said user’s NM
dataXchange access has been disabled, and will be sent a notice describing
the violation(s) and the process to follow to seek restoration of NM
dataXchange access.
3. For all users seeking restoration, the user must submit a new and complete
application with a letter addressed to the OAS Chair detailing the reasons
f
or, or the circumstances surrounding, the violation that led to the user’s
di
sabled access.
4. Violations:
A. For a first violation OAS will consider the new application and
explanatory letter and determine whether NM dataXchange access
shall be restored. OAS may request that the user appear before OAS
to provide further explanation as to the violation before making a final
determination.
B. Any subsequent violations will result in permanent termination of NM
dataXchange access without OAS review unless a hearing is requested
within 30 days in writing to the OAS Chair. If OAS upholds the
permanent termination or no review is requested timely and the
violator is an attorney, an automatic referral to the Disciplinary Board
of the New Mexico Supreme Court will be made by the Director of
the Administrative Office of the Courts (“AOC”).
5. All decisions by OAS will be communicated in writing by the Director of
the Administrative Office of the Courts (“AOC”).
6. Any decision of OAS may be appealed by requesting a date to appear
before JIFFY in writing to the AOC Judiciary Chief Information Officer
(CIO).
Provenance
- Source
- nmcourts.gov
- Retrieved
- 2026-09-30
- Edition
- 2026-09-30
- Content hash
3bcfb15dd61a00c5f71d4ec24ef550a8083d8f1ad6e1f5199df7de41d23c8536
The link goes to the issuing authority’s own document — the one we read to produce this record. Where a source publishes whole titles rather than sections, your browser may need a moment to jump to the provision.
Unofficial copy of government-published law, reproduced from official sources with full provenance. Not an official publication; verify against official sources before relying on it in a filing. Records in the 'guidance' corpus, and only that corpus, are sub-regulatory (interpretive guidelines, survey procedures) and are not binding law. Validity bounds follow each jurisdiction's declared temporalBasis.