NM · rules
N.M. ADR PACA Mediation Framework
PACA Mediation Framework
CHILDREN’S COURT MEDIATION PROGRAM
FRAMEWORK FOR MEDIATING POST ADOPTION CONTACT AGREEMENTS
(To be reviewed at the initial meeting with all parties. The purpose is to clarify
the guiding principles of the child best interests, and preserving connections
within families; as well as clarify possible outcomes/options for families.)
1. The guiding principle underlying our efforts to mediate an open adoption is the best
interests of the child(ren). The purpose of establishing a post adoption contact
agreement between the birth parents and the prospective adoptive parents is to
preserve connections for the child(ren), including maintaining contact between siblings
and other family members.
2. The Department’s current plan to terminate parental rights is based on the child’s need
for permanency. The plan to terminate parental rights is only a plan and it is the judge in
the case who decides whether to terminate parental rights.
3. No parent should feel threatened or forced into any agreement to maintain contact with a
child. The plan to terminate parental rights cannot be used to put a parent in the position
where they feel that they have no choice but to go along and agree to whatever is
offered. A parent should only enter into an agreement that they feel is in the best
interests of their child.
4. There are three basic outcomes possible when we agree to mediate a post adoption
contact agreement. The first outcome is a written agreement between the birth parents
and prospective adoptive parents that says what the contact will involve. The second
outcome is an informal agreement between the birth parent and the prospective adoptive
parents. The third is when the parties cannot agree to contact terms.
5. The post adoption contact agreement will be attached to the final decree of adoption and
can be enforced by the court. A violation of the agreement will not result in the adoption
being undone but it can give the birth and/or adoptive parent the chance to have the
judge make a decision about any violation of the contact agreement.
6. Any unwritten, informal agreement between the birth parent and the prospective
adoptive parent can be just as good as a written post adoption contact agreement, the
main difference being that it cannot be enforced by the court. It is based on trust that the
adults in the child’s life will always stay focused on what’s best for the child and that the
adults will be open to the needs of the child.
7. The post adoption contact agreement creates a responsibility for both the prospective
adoptive parents and birth parents. No adoptive parent to be should feel that they have
to agree to a contact agreement that is not in the best interests of the child.
8. The mediated open adoption process is not a plea bargain process. It is a confidential
process of reaching an agreement about what type of contact is in the child’s best
interests. Whatever agreement is reached between the birth parent and the prospective
adoptive parent should always be the result of an agreement about what is in the long
term, the best interest of the child.
CCMP: Effective 7/1/2015
Provenance
- Source
- adr.nmcourts.gov
- Retrieved
- 2026-09-30
- Edition
- 2026-09-30
- Content hash
54794c0c1285d48a96cb607b0cb5b7a05292b5907ecedc3c3b3df8909a7351c2
The link goes to the issuing authority’s own document — the one we read to produce this record. Where a source publishes whole titles rather than sections, your browser may need a moment to jump to the provision.
Unofficial copy of government-published law, reproduced from official sources with full provenance. Not an official publication; verify against official sources before relying on it in a filing. Records in the 'guidance' corpus, and only that corpus, are sub-regulatory (interpretive guidelines, survey procedures) and are not binding law. Validity bounds follow each jurisdiction's declared temporalBasis.