Bindinglaw

NJ · rules

N.J. Ct. R. 3:28-6

Appeal of Decision by Criminal Division Manager or Prosecutor

activein force · 2018-07-01 – presentact-effective-date

(a) Time to File. A defendant challenging the decision of the criminal division manager not to recommend enrollment, or of a prosecutor refusing to consent to consideration of the defendant’s application where required pursuant to R. 3:28-1(d), or of a prosecutor’s refusing to consent to the defendant’s enrollment into the pretrial intervention program, shall file a motion with the Presiding Judge of the Criminal Division, or the judge to whom the case has been assigned, within ten days after receipt of the rejection and, if prepared, of the Criminal Division Manager’s report. The motion shall be made returnable at such time as the judge determines will promote an expeditious disposition of the case.

(b) Standards.

(1) A defendant challenging a prosecutor’s decision to refuse to consent to consideration of an application must establish that the prosecutor’s decision was a patent and gross abuse of discretion. When considering an appeal, the court shall make an individualized determination, on a case-by-case basis, of whether a prosecutor’s decision to refuse to consent to consideration of an application for pretrial intervention was a patent and gross abuse of discretion.

(2) A defendant challenging the criminal division manager’s recommendation against enrollment into the pretrial intervention program must establish that the decision was arbitrary and capricious.

(3) A defendant challenging the prosecutor’s recommendation against enrollment into the pretrial intervention program must establish that the decision was a patent and gross abuse of discretion.

(c) Appellate Review. If the rejection is upheld by the judge, there shall be no pretrial review by an appellate court of a decision of the prosecutor to refuse to consent to consideration of the application, or of a decision of the criminal division manager, or of the prosecutor to refuse to enroll a defendant into the pretrial intervention program. An order enrolling a defendant into the pretrial intervention program over the prosecutor's objection shall be deemed final for purposes of appeal, as of right, and shall be automatically stayed for fifteen days following its entry and thereafter pending appellate review.

(d) Appeal After Judgment of Conviction. Denial of an application or enrollment pursuant to this rule may be reviewed on appeal from a judgment of conviction notwithstanding that such judgment is entered following a plea of guilty.

History

Note: Adopted September 15, 2017 to be effective July 1, 2018.

Provenance

Source
njcourts.gov
Retrieved
2026-09-14
Edition
2026-09-14
Content hash
a7b23aeaf93bba8facb8bd6f615977f0694e28caaaf41b3e29dbe6502d7c12aa
View the official source →

The link goes to the issuing authority’s own document — the one we read to produce this record. Where a source publishes whole titles rather than sections, your browser may need a moment to jump to the provision.

Unofficial copy of government-published law, reproduced from official sources with full provenance. Not an official publication; verify against official sources before relying on it in a filing. Records in the 'guidance' corpus, and only that corpus, are sub-regulatory (interpretive guidelines, survey procedures) and are not binding law. Validity bounds follow each jurisdiction's declared temporalBasis.

Coverage · API docs

Bindinglaw

Point-in-time US law with the receipt attached. Source URL, retrieval time, content hash, and validity dates on every answer.

curl api.binding.law/v1/law/coverage

© 2026 binding.law · a Jubal, Inc. productAttorneys and firms never pay. Ever.
N.J. Ct. R. 3:28-6 — Appeal of Decision by Criminal D… · binding.law