Bindinglaw

NJ · rules

N.J. Ct. R. 1:17A-2

Jurisdiction

activein force · 1993-12-07 – presentact-effective-date

The Committee shall have jurisdiction to interpret the Code of Conduct for Judiciary Employees. In particular, the Committee shall have jurisdiction to issue advisory opinions and to render decisions as follows:

(a) The Committee shall render advisory opinions concerning employees' outside activities when such opinions are requested by any judiciary employee or supervisor.

(b) The Committee shall decide whether to permit employees who are subject to Canon 5.C.1 of the Code of Conduct to accept appointments to public positions or to undertake community activities. Such employees are required to obtain the consent of the Committee before beginning any of those activities.

(c) The Committee shall decide appeals from any judiciary employee who has been informed of an adverse decision:

(1) regarding outside employment by a supervisor or other person named in Canon 5.B.14.a.(2)(a)-(f) of the Code of Conduct;

(2) regarding appointment to a public position by a supervisor or other person named in Canon 5.C.2.e.(2)(a)-(f) of the Code of Conduct;

(3) regarding participation in non-partisan political activities by a supervisor or other person named in Canon 6.H.2.(a)-(f) of the Code of Conduct.

(d) The Committee shall render advisory opinions in any matter when requested to do so by the Supreme Court.

History

Note: Adopted December 7, 1993, to be effective immediately.

Provenance

Source
njcourts.gov
Retrieved
2026-09-14
Edition
2026-09-14
Content hash
c1958cf714a75b8d8eeb7a7e6445dcd73231a0ae07edeb6abe638a9ceaf6316d
View the official source →

The link goes to the issuing authority’s own document — the one we read to produce this record. Where a source publishes whole titles rather than sections, your browser may need a moment to jump to the provision.

Unofficial copy of government-published law, reproduced from official sources with full provenance. Not an official publication; verify against official sources before relying on it in a filing. Records in the 'guidance' corpus, and only that corpus, are sub-regulatory (interpretive guidelines, survey procedures) and are not binding law. Validity bounds follow each jurisdiction's declared temporalBasis.

Coverage · API docs

Bindinglaw

Point-in-time US law with the receipt attached. Source URL, retrieval time, content hash, and validity dates on every answer.

curl api.binding.law/v1/law/coverage

© 2026 binding.law · a Jubal, Inc. productAttorneys and firms never pay. Ever.