NJ · rules

N.J.R.E. 406

Habit, Routine Practice

activein force · 1993-07-01 – presentact-effective-date

(a) Evidence, whether corroborated or not, of habit or routine practice is admissible to prove that on a specific occasion a person or organization acted in conformity with the habit or routine practice.

(b) Evidence of specific instances of conduct is admissible to prove habit or routine practice if evidence of a sufficient number of such instances is offered to support a finding of such habit or routine practice.

History

NOTE: Adopted September 15, 1992 to be effective July 1, 1993.

Provenance

Source: njcourts.gov
Retrieved: 2026-09-15
Edition: 2026-09-14
Content hash: 41ac7f8853ca60f49fea71c349cda3b03f893d8375cf3ca5a694212f116b2b83

View the official source →

The link goes to the issuing authority’s own document — the one we read to produce this record. Where a source publishes whole titles rather than sections, your browser may need a moment to jump to the provision.

Unofficial copy of government-published law, reproduced from official sources with full provenance. Not an official publication; verify against official sources before relying on it in a filing. Records in the 'guidance' corpus, and only that corpus, are sub-regulatory (interpretive guidelines, survey procedures) and are not binding law. Validity bounds follow each jurisdiction's declared temporalBasis.

Coverage · API docs