NJ · jury_instructions
N.J. Model Criminal Jury Charge, N.J.S.A. 2C:21-20c
Unlicensed Practice of Medicine and Surgery or Podiatry – Holding Out to Public as Eligible to Practice
Approved 4/17/17
UNLICENSED PRACTICE OF MEDICINE AND SURGERY OR PODIATRY
HOLDING OUT TO PUBLIC AS ELIGIBLE TO PRACTICE
(N.J.S.A. 2C:21-20c)
Count ____ of the indictment in this case charges the defendant with holding
himself/herself out to the public or any person as being eligible to engage in the practice of
medicine.
(Read the count from the indictment)
That section of our statutes provides in pertinent part:
A person is guilty of a crime if he knowingly [Choose as
appropriate: (does not possess a license or permit to practice
medicine and surgery or podiatric medicine) OR (has had his
license or permit to practice medicine and surgery or podiatric
medicine suspended, revoked or otherwise limited by an order
entered by the State Board of Medical Examiners)] and he holds
himself out to the public or any person as being eligible to engage
in that practice.
In order for the defendant to be convicted of this offense, the State must prove the
following elements beyond a reasonable doubt:
1) Defendant knowingly [Choose as appropriate: ( did not possess a license or permit
to practice medicine and surgery or podiatric medicine) OR (has had his/her license
or permit to practice medicine and surgery or podiatric medicine suspended, revoked
or otherwise limited by an order entered by the State Board of Medical Examiners)];
and
2) Defendant knowingly held himself/herself out to the public or any person as being
eligible to engage in that practice.
The first element the State must prove beyond a reasonable doubt is that the defendant
knowingly [Choose as appropriate: ( did not possess a license or permit to practice medicine
and surgery or podiatric medicine) OR (has had the license or permit to practice medicine and
surgery or podiatric medicine suspended, revoked or otherwise limited by an order entered by the
State Board of Medical Examiners)].
A person acts knowingly with respect to the nature of his/her conduct or the attendant
circumstances if he/she is aware that his/her conduct is of that nature or that such circumstances
exist or if he/she is aware of a high probability of their existence. Knowledge is a condition of
the mind that cannot be seen and that can often be determined only fr om inferences from
UNLICENSED PRACTICE OF MEDICINE AND
SURGERY OR PODIATRY -
HOLDING OUT TO PUBLIC AS ELIGIBLE TO PRACTICE
N.J.S.A. 2C:21-20c
conduct, words, or acts. A state of mind is rarely susceptible of direct proof but must ordinarily
be inferred from the facts. Therefore, it is not necessary that the State produce witnesses to
testify that an accused said that he/she had a certain state of mind when he/she engaged in a
particular act. It is within your power to find that such proof has been furnished beyond a
reasonable doubt by inference, which may arise from the nature of the defendant’s acts and
conduct, from all that he/she said and did at the particular time and place, and from all
surrounding circumstances. The State need not prove it was the defendant’s intent to obtain a
pecuniary benefit, nor to injure or defraud another, but only that the defendant acted knowingly
as I have defined that term for you.1
The second element the State must prove beyond a reasonable doubt is that the defendant
knowingly held himself/herself out to the public or any person as being eligible to engage in that
practice. Here, the State alleges that the defendant [insert State’s theory of the case here] .
[Add, if requested by the defendant: The defendant claims [insert defendant’s theory of the
case.]
If you find that the State has proven each of these elements beyond a reasonable doubt,
then you must find the defendant guilty. If, however, the State has failed to prove any element
beyond a reasonable doubt, then you must find the defendant not guilty.
1 Cannel, N.J. Criminal Code Annotated , comment on N.J.S.A. 2C:21-20 (2016-17); see also Morris v.
Muller, 113 N.J.L. 46, 49 (E. & A. 1934) ("But it is also the rule that when one holds himself out to the
public as having professional skill, and offers his services to those who accept them on th at supposition,
he is responsible for want of the skill he pretends to, even when his services are rendered gratuitously.")
History
Approved 4/17/17
Provenance
- Source
- njcourts.gov
- Retrieved
- 2026-08-20
- Edition
- 2026-08-20
- Content hash
987eb048319f9700b46b042eba2d4cb1b7f7f290260357a19f56952ff9d1fc62
The link goes to the issuing authority’s own document — the one we read to produce this record. Where a source publishes whole titles rather than sections, your browser may need a moment to jump to the provision.
Unofficial copy of government-published law, reproduced from official sources with full provenance. Not an official publication; verify against official sources before relying on it in a filing. Records in the 'guidance' corpus, and only that corpus, are sub-regulatory (interpretive guidelines, survey procedures) and are not binding law. Validity bounds follow each jurisdiction's declared temporalBasis.