Bindinglaw

NJ · jury_instructions

N.J. Model Criminal Jury Charge, N.J.S.A. 2C:21-20c

Unlicensed Practice of Medicine and Surgery or Podiatry – Holding Out to Public as Eligible to Practice

activein force · 2017-04-17 – presentas-observed

Approved 4/17/17

UNLICENSED PRACTICE OF MEDICINE AND SURGERY OR PODIATRY

HOLDING OUT TO PUBLIC AS ELIGIBLE TO PRACTICE

(N.J.S.A. 2C:21-20c)

Count ____ of the indictment in this case charges the defendant with holding

himself/herself out to the public or any person as being eligible to engage in the practice of

medicine.

(Read the count from the indictment)

That section of our statutes provides in pertinent part:

A person is guilty of a crime if he knowingly [Choose as

appropriate: (does not possess a license or permit to practice

medicine and surgery or podiatric medicine) OR (has had his

license or permit to practice medicine and surgery or podiatric

medicine suspended, revoked or otherwise limited by an order

entered by the State Board of Medical Examiners)] and he holds

himself out to the public or any person as being eligible to engage

in that practice.

In order for the defendant to be convicted of this offense, the State must prove the

following elements beyond a reasonable doubt:

1) Defendant knowingly [Choose as appropriate: ( did not possess a license or permit

to practice medicine and surgery or podiatric medicine) OR (has had his/her license

or permit to practice medicine and surgery or podiatric medicine suspended, revoked

or otherwise limited by an order entered by the State Board of Medical Examiners)];

and

2) Defendant knowingly held himself/herself out to the public or any person as being

eligible to engage in that practice.

The first element the State must prove beyond a reasonable doubt is that the defendant

knowingly [Choose as appropriate: ( did not possess a license or permit to practice medicine

and surgery or podiatric medicine) OR (has had the license or permit to practice medicine and

surgery or podiatric medicine suspended, revoked or otherwise limited by an order entered by the

State Board of Medical Examiners)].

A person acts knowingly with respect to the nature of his/her conduct or the attendant

circumstances if he/she is aware that his/her conduct is of that nature or that such circumstances

exist or if he/she is aware of a high probability of their existence. Knowledge is a condition of

the mind that cannot be seen and that can often be determined only fr om inferences from

UNLICENSED PRACTICE OF MEDICINE AND

SURGERY OR PODIATRY -

HOLDING OUT TO PUBLIC AS ELIGIBLE TO PRACTICE

N.J.S.A. 2C:21-20c

conduct, words, or acts. A state of mind is rarely susceptible of direct proof but must ordinarily

be inferred from the facts. Therefore, it is not necessary that the State produce witnesses to

testify that an accused said that he/she had a certain state of mind when he/she engaged in a

particular act. It is within your power to find that such proof has been furnished beyond a

reasonable doubt by inference, which may arise from the nature of the defendant’s acts and

conduct, from all that he/she said and did at the particular time and place, and from all

surrounding circumstances. The State need not prove it was the defendant’s intent to obtain a

pecuniary benefit, nor to injure or defraud another, but only that the defendant acted knowingly

as I have defined that term for you.1

The second element the State must prove beyond a reasonable doubt is that the defendant

knowingly held himself/herself out to the public or any person as being eligible to engage in that

practice. Here, the State alleges that the defendant [insert State’s theory of the case here] .

[Add, if requested by the defendant: The defendant claims [insert defendant’s theory of the

case.]

If you find that the State has proven each of these elements beyond a reasonable doubt,

then you must find the defendant guilty. If, however, the State has failed to prove any element

beyond a reasonable doubt, then you must find the defendant not guilty.

1 Cannel, N.J. Criminal Code Annotated , comment on N.J.S.A. 2C:21-20 (2016-17); see also Morris v.

Muller, 113 N.J.L. 46, 49 (E. & A. 1934) ("But it is also the rule that when one holds himself out to the

public as having professional skill, and offers his services to those who accept them on th at supposition,

he is responsible for want of the skill he pretends to, even when his services are rendered gratuitously.")

History

Approved 4/17/17

Provenance

Source
njcourts.gov
Retrieved
2026-08-20
Edition
2026-08-20
Content hash
987eb048319f9700b46b042eba2d4cb1b7f7f290260357a19f56952ff9d1fc62
View the official source →

The link goes to the issuing authority’s own document — the one we read to produce this record. Where a source publishes whole titles rather than sections, your browser may need a moment to jump to the provision.

Unofficial copy of government-published law, reproduced from official sources with full provenance. Not an official publication; verify against official sources before relying on it in a filing. Records in the 'guidance' corpus, and only that corpus, are sub-regulatory (interpretive guidelines, survey procedures) and are not binding law. Validity bounds follow each jurisdiction's declared temporalBasis.

Coverage · API docs

Bindinglaw

Point-in-time US law with the receipt attached. Source URL, retrieval time, content hash, and validity dates on every answer.

curl api.binding.law/v1/law/coverage

© 2026 binding.law · a Jubal, Inc. productAttorneys and firms never pay. Ever.