Bindinglaw

NJ · jury_instructions

N.J. Model Criminal Jury Charge, N.J.S.A. Non 2C

Compensation of Experts (Optional)

activein force · 2001-10-01 – presentas-observed

Approved 10/1/01

OPTIONAL CHARGE CONCERNING COMPENSATION OF EXPERTS

The expert witnesses who testified, of course, are paid for their work. [CHARGE

WHERE APPROPRIATE:1 Experts are paid for their specia l knowledge, skill, experience, or

training. Some may be full-time employees who receive a regular salary for their work, and some

may be outside experts consulted for this particular case who receive a fixed or hourly fee.]

You may consider the compensation received by the expert witness(es) as bearing on

(his/her/their) credibility. You should understand, however, that there is nothing improper in any

expert receiving reasonable compensation for (his/her) work or for (his/her) appearing in court.

[CHARGE WHERE APPROPRIATE IF RAISED BY THE EVIDENCE]

If you find from the evidence that the amount of compensation received is unreasonable,

or if you find from the evidence that the expert wa s paid simply to reach a particular result, you

may consider whether that affects the credibility, interest or bias of the witness.

[CHARGE IN ALL CASES]

As always, you may give the opinion such we ight as you determine it deserves, consistent

with the general rules of determining credibility.

1 See State v. Smith, 167 N.J. 158, 189 (2001).

History

Approved 10/1/01

Provenance

Source
njcourts.gov
Retrieved
2026-08-20
Edition
2026-08-20
Content hash
1d61e76060fde0781e0bcc7a1daca9fdb15dbe8136aa33e70cc5d86d27be0230
View the official source →

The link goes to the issuing authority’s own document — the one we read to produce this record. Where a source publishes whole titles rather than sections, your browser may need a moment to jump to the provision.

Unofficial copy of government-published law, reproduced from official sources with full provenance. Not an official publication; verify against official sources before relying on it in a filing. Records in the 'guidance' corpus, and only that corpus, are sub-regulatory (interpretive guidelines, survey procedures) and are not binding law. Validity bounds follow each jurisdiction's declared temporalBasis.

Coverage · API docs

Bindinglaw

Point-in-time US law with the receipt attached. Source URL, retrieval time, content hash, and validity dates on every answer.

curl api.binding.law/v1/law/coverage

© 2026 binding.law · a Jubal, Inc. productAttorneys and firms never pay. Ever.