NJ · jury_instructions
N.J. Model Criminal Jury Charge, N.J.S.A. Non 2C
Credibility - Prior Conviction of Defendant
Revised 2/24/03
CREDIBILITY - PRIOR CONVICTION OF A DEFENDANT
You have heard evidence that (name of defendant) has previ ously been convicted of [a]
crime[s]. This evidence may only be used in determining the credibility or believability of the
defendant’s testimony. You may not conclude that the defendant committed the crime charged
in this case or is more likely to have committed the crime charged simply because he/she
committed a crime on another occasion.
A jury has a right to consider whether a pe rson who has previously failed to comply with
society's rules as demonstrated through a crimin al conviction would be mo re likely to ignore the
oath requiring truthfulness on the witness stand than a person who has never been convicted of
any crime. You may consider in determ ining this issue the nature and degree
1 of the prior
conviction[s] and when it [they] occurred.
Our law permits a conviction to be received in evidence only for the purpose of affecting
the credibility of the defendant and for no othe r purpose. You are not, however, obligated to
change your opinion as to the credibility of the defendant simply because of [a] prior
conviction[s]. You may consider such evidence along wi th all the other fact ors we previously
discussed in determining the credibility of the defendant.
1 State v. Brunson, 132 N.J. 377 (1993)
History
Revised 2/24/03
Provenance
- Source
- njcourts.gov
- Retrieved
- 2026-08-20
- Edition
- 2026-08-20
- Content hash
c19f6b0b0e3c0fef024cd6a2c1b462e4da8814cc5ce84e919027301bea97c450
The link goes to the issuing authority’s own document — the one we read to produce this record. Where a source publishes whole titles rather than sections, your browser may need a moment to jump to the provision.
Unofficial copy of government-published law, reproduced from official sources with full provenance. Not an official publication; verify against official sources before relying on it in a filing. Records in the 'guidance' corpus, and only that corpus, are sub-regulatory (interpretive guidelines, survey procedures) and are not binding law. Validity bounds follow each jurisdiction's declared temporalBasis.