NJ · jury_instructions
N.J. Model Criminal Jury Charge, N.J.S.A. 2C:21-9a
Misconduct by Corporate Official
Approved 2/13/17
MISCONDUCT BY CORPORATE OFFICIAL
(N.J.S.A. 2C:21-9a)
Count __________of the indictment charges the defendant with the crime of Misconduct
by Corporate Official.
(READ COUNT OF INDICTMENT)
The statute reads in pertinent part as follows:
A person is guilty of Misconduct by Corporate Official when, being a
Director of a Corporation, he knowingly and with purpose to defraud,
concurs in any vote or act of the directors of such corporation,
or any of them, which has the purpose of:
(a) Making a dividend except in the manner provided by the law.
(or)
(b) Dividing, withdrawing or in any manner paying to any
stockholder any part of the capital stock of the corporation
except in the manner provided by law.
(or)
(c) Discounting or receiving any note or other evidence of debt in
payment of an installment of capital stock actually called in
and required to be paid, or with purpose of providing the means
of making such payment.
(or)
(d) Receiving or discounting any note or other evidence of debt
with purpose of enabling any stockholder to withdraw any part
of the money paid in by him on his stock.
(or)
(e) Applying any portion of the funds of such corporation, directly
or indirectly, to the purchase of shares of its own stock, except
in the manner provided by law.
Misconduct by Corporate Official
N.J.S.A. 2C:21-9a
In order for you to find the defendant guilty of the crime of Misconduct by Corporate
Official, the State must prove beyond a reasonable doubt the following elements:
1. That the defendant was a Director of a Corporation.
2. That he/she knowingly with purpose to defraud did concur
in any vote or act of the Directors of such Corporation or any of
them, which had the purpose of:
[CHOOSE AS APPROPRIATE]
(a) Making a dividend except in the manner provided by law.
(or)
(b) [Dividing], [withdrawing] or [in any manner paying to any
Stockholder] (Choose appropriate) any part of the capital stock
of the corporation except in the manner provided by law.
(or)
(c) [Discounting], [Receiving] (Choose appropriate), any note or
other evidence of debt in payment of an installment
of capital stock actually called in and required to be paid, or
with the purpose of providing the means of making such
payment.
(or)
(d) [Receiving] or [discounting] (Choose appropriate) any note or
other evidence of debt with purpose of enabling any stockholder
to withdraw any part of the money paid by him/her on his/her stock.
(or)
(e) Applying any portion of funds of such Corporation, directly or
indirectly, to the purchase of shares of its own stock, except in
the manner provided by law.
First, the State must prove beyond a reasonable doubt that ( defendant) was a Corporate
Official of (name the corporation) and was further the/a Director of said Corporation.
“Corporation” is an entity having authority under law to act as a single person distinct
from the shareholders who own it and having rights to issue stock and exist indefinitely; a group
or successor of persons established in accordance with l egal rules into a legal or juristic person
Misconduct by Corporate Official
N.J.S.A. 2C:21-9a
that has a legal personality distinct from the natural persons who make it up, exists indefinitely
apart from them, and has the legal powers that its constitution gives it.1
A Corporate Official or Corporate Offi cer is a person elected or appointed by the Board
of Directors to manage the daily operations of a corporation, such as a CEO, president, secretary
or treasurer.2 The officers of a corporation shall consist of a president, a secretary, a treasurer,
and if desired, a chairman of the Board, one or more vice -presidents, and such other officers that
may be prescribed by the by-laws. Unless otherwise provided in the by-laws, the officers shall be
elected by the board.3
A Director of a Corporation is one who manages, guides, or orders; a chief
administrator;4 a person appointed or elected to sit on a board that manages the affairs of a
corporation or other organization by electing and exercising control over its officers.5
Second, the State must prove beyond a reasonable doubt that ( defendant) knowingly
with purpose to defraud did concur in any vote or act of the Directors of such Corporation or any
of them, [with the purpose of m aking a dividend except in the manner provided by law]; [or
(dividing), (withdrawing) or (in any manner paying to any stockholder) ( Choose appropriate)
any part of the capital stock of the corporation except in the manner provided by law]; [or
(discounting), (receiving) (Choose appropriate ) any note , or any other evidence of debt in
payment of an installment of capital stock actually called in and required to be paid, or with
purpose of providing the means of making such payment]; [or (receiving) or (discounting)
(Choose appropriate ) any note or other evidence of debt with the purpose of enabling any
stockholder to withdraw any part of the money paid by him /her on his/her stock]; [or applying
any portion of funds of such corporation, directly or indirectly , to the purchase of shares of its
own stock, except in the manner prescribed by law].
A person acts knowingly when he/she is aware that it is practically certain that his/her
conduct will purposely defraud. A person acts knowingly with respect to the nature of his/her
conduct or the attended circumstances if he/she is aware that his/her conduct is of that nature, or
that such circumstances exist or he/she is aware of the high probability of their existence. A
1 Black’s Law Dictionary (9th ed. 2009); for additional reference, see also N.J.S.A. 14A:1-2.1(g).
2 Black’s Law Dictionary (9th ed. 2009); for additional reference, see also “Director,” N.J.S.A.
14A:1-2.1(h).
3 N.J.S.A. 14A:1-2.1(h).
4 Black’s Law Dictionary (9th ed. 2009).
5 N.J.S.A. 14A:1-2.1(g).
Misconduct by Corporate Official
N.J.S.A. 2C:21-9a
person acts knowingly as to the result of his/her conduct if he/she is aware that it is practically
certain that his/her conduct will cause such result. “Knowing,” “with knowledge,” or equivalent
terms have the same meaning.
A person acts purposely with respect to the nature of his/her conduct or a result thereof
if it is his/her conscious object to engage in conduct of that nature or to cause such a result. A
person acts purposely with respect to attendant circumstances if he/she is aware of such
circumstances or he/she believes or hopes that they exist.
Knowing and purpose are conditions of the mind. They cannot be seen. They can only
be determined by inference from the defendant’s conduct, words or acts. A state of mind is
rarely susceptible of direct proof but must ordinarily be inferred from the facts. Therefore, it is
not necessary that the State produce witnesses to testify that an accused said that he/she had a
certain state of mind when he/she did a particular thing. It is within your power to find that such
proof has been furnished beyond a reasonable doubt by inference which may arise from the
nature of his/her acts and conduct and from al l he/she said and did at a particular time and place
and from all surrounding circumstances established by the evidence.
To” defraud” means to deprive a person of property or any interest, estate, or right by
deceit or artifice, to cheat.6
A “vote” means the expression of one’s preference or opinion in a meeting or election
by ballot, show of hands, or other type of communication.7
[CHARGE AS APPLICABLE]
“Dividend” or “Making a dividend” means a portion of the company’s earnings or
profits distributed pro rata to its shareholders, usually in the form of cash or additional shares.8
“Stockholder” is one who owns or holds a share or shares in a company, especially a
corporation. Also termed “shareholder.”9 “Shareholder” means one who is a holder of record of
shares in a corporation.10
“Capital Stock of Corporation” means the total shares of stock that a corporation may
issue under its charter or articles of incorporation, including both common stock and preferred
6 Black’s Law Dictionary (4th ed. 1968).
7 Black’s Law Dictionary (9th ed. 2009); for additional reference, see also N.J.S.A. 14A:1-2.1(r).
8 Black’s Law Dictionary (9th ed. 2009); for additional reference, see also N.J.S.A. 14A:7-15.
9 Black’s Law Dictionary (9th ed. 2009); for additional reference, see also N.J.S.A. 14A:1-2.1(l).
10 N.J.S.A. 14A:1-2.1(l).
Misconduct by Corporate Official
N.J.S.A. 2C:21-9a
stock. Also termed “authorized stock,” “authorized capital stock,” authorized stock issue,”
“authorized shares;” the total par value or stated value of this stock.11
“Installment” of Capital Stock means a periodic partial payment of a debt.12
“Note” means a written promise by one party (the “maker”) to pay money to another
party (the “payee”) or the bearer.13
“Stock” is the capital or principal fund raised by a corporation through subscribers’
contributions or sale of shares; a proportional part of a corporation’s capital represented by the
number of equal units (shares) owned, granting the holder the right to participate in the
company’s general management and to share in its net profit or earnings.14
“Shares of Stock” means an allotted portion owned by, contributed by, or due to
someone.15 “ Shares” means the units into which proprietary interest in a corporation are
divided.16
[CHARGE IN ALL CASES]
If you find the State has proven all of the above elements beyond a reasonable doubt,
then you must find the defendant guilty of the crime charged.
If, however, you find the State has failed to prove any of the elements of the crime
beyond a reasonable doubt, you must then find the defendant not guilty.
If you have found that the State has proven all of the above elements beyond a
reasonable do ubt then you must now determine whether the benefit derived from this act is
valued at $75,000 or more, exceeds $1,000 but is less than $75,000 or the benefit derived is
$1,000 or less.
11 Black’s Law Dictionary (9th ed. 2009).
12 Black’s Law Dictionary (9th ed. 2009).
13 Black’s Law Dictionary (9th ed. 2009).
14 Black’s Law Dictionary (9th ed. 2009).
15 Black’s Law Dictionary (9th ed. 2009); for additional reference, see also N.J.S.A. 14A:1-2.1(m).
16 N.J.S.A. 14A:1-2.1(m).
History
Approved 2/13/17
Provenance
- Source
- njcourts.gov
- Retrieved
- 2026-08-20
- Edition
- 2026-08-20
- Content hash
c92316525fdfa7b800cb56675f8303dedcbb2d31dfcd0f05fa2c02a8d0265915
The link goes to the issuing authority’s own document — the one we read to produce this record. Where a source publishes whole titles rather than sections, your browser may need a moment to jump to the provision.
Unofficial copy of government-published law, reproduced from official sources with full provenance. Not an official publication; verify against official sources before relying on it in a filing. Records in the 'guidance' corpus, and only that corpus, are sub-regulatory (interpretive guidelines, survey procedures) and are not binding law. Validity bounds follow each jurisdiction's declared temporalBasis.