Bindinglaw

NJ · jury_instructions

N.J. Model Criminal Jury Charge, N.J.S.A. 2C:21-9a

Misconduct by Corporate Official

activein force · 2017-02-13 – presentas-observed

Approved 2/13/17

MISCONDUCT BY CORPORATE OFFICIAL

(N.J.S.A. 2C:21-9a)

Count __________of the indictment charges the defendant with the crime of Misconduct

by Corporate Official.

(READ COUNT OF INDICTMENT)

The statute reads in pertinent part as follows:

A person is guilty of Misconduct by Corporate Official when, being a

Director of a Corporation, he knowingly and with purpose to defraud,

concurs in any vote or act of the directors of such corporation,

or any of them, which has the purpose of:

(a) Making a dividend except in the manner provided by the law.

(or)

(b) Dividing, withdrawing or in any manner paying to any

stockholder any part of the capital stock of the corporation

except in the manner provided by law.

(or)

(c) Discounting or receiving any note or other evidence of debt in

payment of an installment of capital stock actually called in

and required to be paid, or with purpose of providing the means

of making such payment.

(or)

(d) Receiving or discounting any note or other evidence of debt

with purpose of enabling any stockholder to withdraw any part

of the money paid in by him on his stock.

(or)

(e) Applying any portion of the funds of such corporation, directly

or indirectly, to the purchase of shares of its own stock, except

in the manner provided by law.

Misconduct by Corporate Official

N.J.S.A. 2C:21-9a

In order for you to find the defendant guilty of the crime of Misconduct by Corporate

Official, the State must prove beyond a reasonable doubt the following elements:

1. That the defendant was a Director of a Corporation.

2. That he/she knowingly with purpose to defraud did concur

in any vote or act of the Directors of such Corporation or any of

them, which had the purpose of:

[CHOOSE AS APPROPRIATE]

(a) Making a dividend except in the manner provided by law.

(or)

(b) [Dividing], [withdrawing] or [in any manner paying to any

Stockholder] (Choose appropriate) any part of the capital stock

of the corporation except in the manner provided by law.

(or)

(c) [Discounting], [Receiving] (Choose appropriate), any note or

other evidence of debt in payment of an installment

of capital stock actually called in and required to be paid, or

with the purpose of providing the means of making such

payment.

(or)

(d) [Receiving] or [discounting] (Choose appropriate) any note or

other evidence of debt with purpose of enabling any stockholder

to withdraw any part of the money paid by him/her on his/her stock.

(or)

(e) Applying any portion of funds of such Corporation, directly or

indirectly, to the purchase of shares of its own stock, except in

the manner provided by law.

First, the State must prove beyond a reasonable doubt that ( defendant) was a Corporate

Official of (name the corporation) and was further the/a Director of said Corporation.

“Corporation” is an entity having authority under law to act as a single person distinct

from the shareholders who own it and having rights to issue stock and exist indefinitely; a group

or successor of persons established in accordance with l egal rules into a legal or juristic person

Misconduct by Corporate Official

N.J.S.A. 2C:21-9a

that has a legal personality distinct from the natural persons who make it up, exists indefinitely

apart from them, and has the legal powers that its constitution gives it.1

A Corporate Official or Corporate Offi cer is a person elected or appointed by the Board

of Directors to manage the daily operations of a corporation, such as a CEO, president, secretary

or treasurer.2 The officers of a corporation shall consist of a president, a secretary, a treasurer,

and if desired, a chairman of the Board, one or more vice -presidents, and such other officers that

may be prescribed by the by-laws. Unless otherwise provided in the by-laws, the officers shall be

elected by the board.3

A Director of a Corporation is one who manages, guides, or orders; a chief

administrator;4 a person appointed or elected to sit on a board that manages the affairs of a

corporation or other organization by electing and exercising control over its officers.5

Second, the State must prove beyond a reasonable doubt that ( defendant) knowingly

with purpose to defraud did concur in any vote or act of the Directors of such Corporation or any

of them, [with the purpose of m aking a dividend except in the manner provided by law]; [or

(dividing), (withdrawing) or (in any manner paying to any stockholder) ( Choose appropriate)

any part of the capital stock of the corporation except in the manner provided by law]; [or

(discounting), (receiving) (Choose appropriate ) any note , or any other evidence of debt in

payment of an installment of capital stock actually called in and required to be paid, or with

purpose of providing the means of making such payment]; [or (receiving) or (discounting)

(Choose appropriate ) any note or other evidence of debt with the purpose of enabling any

stockholder to withdraw any part of the money paid by him /her on his/her stock]; [or applying

any portion of funds of such corporation, directly or indirectly , to the purchase of shares of its

own stock, except in the manner prescribed by law].

A person acts knowingly when he/she is aware that it is practically certain that his/her

conduct will purposely defraud. A person acts knowingly with respect to the nature of his/her

conduct or the attended circumstances if he/she is aware that his/her conduct is of that nature, or

that such circumstances exist or he/she is aware of the high probability of their existence. A

1 Black’s Law Dictionary (9th ed. 2009); for additional reference, see also N.J.S.A. 14A:1-2.1(g).

2 Black’s Law Dictionary (9th ed. 2009); for additional reference, see also “Director,” N.J.S.A.

14A:1-2.1(h).

3 N.J.S.A. 14A:1-2.1(h).

4 Black’s Law Dictionary (9th ed. 2009).

5 N.J.S.A. 14A:1-2.1(g).

Misconduct by Corporate Official

N.J.S.A. 2C:21-9a

person acts knowingly as to the result of his/her conduct if he/she is aware that it is practically

certain that his/her conduct will cause such result. “Knowing,” “with knowledge,” or equivalent

terms have the same meaning.

A person acts purposely with respect to the nature of his/her conduct or a result thereof

if it is his/her conscious object to engage in conduct of that nature or to cause such a result. A

person acts purposely with respect to attendant circumstances if he/she is aware of such

circumstances or he/she believes or hopes that they exist.

Knowing and purpose are conditions of the mind. They cannot be seen. They can only

be determined by inference from the defendant’s conduct, words or acts. A state of mind is

rarely susceptible of direct proof but must ordinarily be inferred from the facts. Therefore, it is

not necessary that the State produce witnesses to testify that an accused said that he/she had a

certain state of mind when he/she did a particular thing. It is within your power to find that such

proof has been furnished beyond a reasonable doubt by inference which may arise from the

nature of his/her acts and conduct and from al l he/she said and did at a particular time and place

and from all surrounding circumstances established by the evidence.

To” defraud” means to deprive a person of property or any interest, estate, or right by

deceit or artifice, to cheat.6

A “vote” means the expression of one’s preference or opinion in a meeting or election

by ballot, show of hands, or other type of communication.7

[CHARGE AS APPLICABLE]

“Dividend” or “Making a dividend” means a portion of the company’s earnings or

profits distributed pro rata to its shareholders, usually in the form of cash or additional shares.8

“Stockholder” is one who owns or holds a share or shares in a company, especially a

corporation. Also termed “shareholder.”9 “Shareholder” means one who is a holder of record of

shares in a corporation.10

“Capital Stock of Corporation” means the total shares of stock that a corporation may

issue under its charter or articles of incorporation, including both common stock and preferred

6 Black’s Law Dictionary (4th ed. 1968).

7 Black’s Law Dictionary (9th ed. 2009); for additional reference, see also N.J.S.A. 14A:1-2.1(r).

8 Black’s Law Dictionary (9th ed. 2009); for additional reference, see also N.J.S.A. 14A:7-15.

9 Black’s Law Dictionary (9th ed. 2009); for additional reference, see also N.J.S.A. 14A:1-2.1(l).

10 N.J.S.A. 14A:1-2.1(l).

Misconduct by Corporate Official

N.J.S.A. 2C:21-9a

stock. Also termed “authorized stock,” “authorized capital stock,” authorized stock issue,”

“authorized shares;” the total par value or stated value of this stock.11

“Installment” of Capital Stock means a periodic partial payment of a debt.12

“Note” means a written promise by one party (the “maker”) to pay money to another

party (the “payee”) or the bearer.13

“Stock” is the capital or principal fund raised by a corporation through subscribers’

contributions or sale of shares; a proportional part of a corporation’s capital represented by the

number of equal units (shares) owned, granting the holder the right to participate in the

company’s general management and to share in its net profit or earnings.14

“Shares of Stock” means an allotted portion owned by, contributed by, or due to

someone.15 “ Shares” means the units into which proprietary interest in a corporation are

divided.16

[CHARGE IN ALL CASES]

If you find the State has proven all of the above elements beyond a reasonable doubt,

then you must find the defendant guilty of the crime charged.

If, however, you find the State has failed to prove any of the elements of the crime

beyond a reasonable doubt, you must then find the defendant not guilty.

If you have found that the State has proven all of the above elements beyond a

reasonable do ubt then you must now determine whether the benefit derived from this act is

valued at $75,000 or more, exceeds $1,000 but is less than $75,000 or the benefit derived is

$1,000 or less.

11 Black’s Law Dictionary (9th ed. 2009).

12 Black’s Law Dictionary (9th ed. 2009).

13 Black’s Law Dictionary (9th ed. 2009).

14 Black’s Law Dictionary (9th ed. 2009).

15 Black’s Law Dictionary (9th ed. 2009); for additional reference, see also N.J.S.A. 14A:1-2.1(m).

16 N.J.S.A. 14A:1-2.1(m).

History

Approved 2/13/17

Provenance

Source
njcourts.gov
Retrieved
2026-08-20
Edition
2026-08-20
Content hash
c92316525fdfa7b800cb56675f8303dedcbb2d31dfcd0f05fa2c02a8d0265915
View the official source →

The link goes to the issuing authority’s own document — the one we read to produce this record. Where a source publishes whole titles rather than sections, your browser may need a moment to jump to the provision.

Unofficial copy of government-published law, reproduced from official sources with full provenance. Not an official publication; verify against official sources before relying on it in a filing. Records in the 'guidance' corpus, and only that corpus, are sub-regulatory (interpretive guidelines, survey procedures) and are not binding law. Validity bounds follow each jurisdiction's declared temporalBasis.

Coverage · API docs

Bindinglaw

Point-in-time US law with the receipt attached. Source URL, retrieval time, content hash, and validity dates on every answer.

curl api.binding.law/v1/law/coverage

© 2026 binding.law · a Jubal, Inc. productAttorneys and firms never pay. Ever.
N.J. Model Criminal Jury Charge, N.J.S.A. 2C:21-9a · binding.law