NJ · jury_instructions
N.J. Model Criminal Jury Charge, N.J.S.A. 2C:2-6b(4)
Conspiracy - Vicarious Liability
Approved 10/17/88
CONSPIRACY - VICARIOUS LIABILITY
(N.J.S.A. 2C:2-6b(4))
Count of the indictment charges the defendant with the crime of . The
State does not allege that the defendant committed the crime of
personally, but rather that he/s he is legally accountable for that crime even though it was
committed by another. More specifically, the State alleges that the crime of
was committed by , and that the defendant is legally
accountable for the crime of committed by
because the defendant and allegedly conspired together
to commit that crime. It is therefore necessary that I instruct you as to both the crime of
and the law of conspiracy.
(HERE REFER TO THE MODEL CHARGE FOR THE PARTICULAR CRIME)
If you are satisfied beyond a reasonable doubt that the State has proven all of these
essential elements and that committed the crime of , then
you must go on to determine the guilt or innocence of the defendant for that same crime.
However, if you are not satisfied beyond a reasonable doubt that
committed the crime of , then your inquiry ends he re and you must return a
verdict of Not Guilty as to the defendant. Therefore, the following instructions on conspiracy are
only for your use if you find beyond a reasonable doubt that
committed the crime of .
Our law provides that a person is guilty of an offense if it is committed by his/her own
conduct or by the conduct of another person for which he/she) is legally accountable, or both. 1
A person is legally accountable for the conduct of another person when he/she is engaged in a
conspiracy with such other person2 and the conduct is within the scope of the conspiracy.3 Thus,
you must decide whether the defendant engaged in a conspiracy with
to commit the crime of .
1 N.J.S.A. 2C:2-6a.
2 N.J.S.A. 2C:2-6b (4).
3 In an appropriate case it may be necessary to charge that a defendant is not legally accountable for conduct
of other persons after the defendant has explicitly abandoned the conspiracy. See N.J.S.A. 2C:5-2f (3).
CONSPIRACY - VICARIOUS LIABILITY
(N.J.S.A. 2C:2-6b (4))
A person is guilty of conspiracy with another person (or persons) 4 if with the purpose of
promoting or facilitating the commission of a crime he/she:
(1) Agrees with such other person or pe rsons that they or one or more of them
will engage in conduct which constitutes such crime or an attempt or
solicitation to commit such crime; or
(2) Agrees to aid such other person or persons in the planning or commission
of such crime or of an attempt or solicitation to commit such crime.
Thus, for the purposes of this case, to find that the defendant engaged in a conspiracy with
you must be satisfied beyond a reasonable doubt of the following
elements:
(1) That defendant agreed with (select
appropriate language); and
(2) That when the defendant so agreed with the
defendant's purpose, i.e., his/her cons cious object, was to promote or to
make it easier for to commit the crime of .
In this case, after consider ation of all of the evidence, if you find beyond a reasonable
doubt that committed the crime of and also that the
defendant conspired with to commit that crime, then you must find the
defendant guilty of the crime of . On the other hand, if you have a
reasonable doubt that committed the crime of , that
the defendant conspired with to commit that crime, or both, then you
must find the defendant not guilty.
4 In an appropriate case it may be necessary to charge as to the scope of a cons piracy involving additional
persons. See N.J.S.A. 2C:5-2b.
History
Approved 10/17/88
Provenance
- Source
- njcourts.gov
- Retrieved
- 2026-08-20
- Edition
- 2026-08-20
- Content hash
250121915d6ca275013f1c88a0b07b559e3eed3606675fe7b371fb5318a6a696
The link goes to the issuing authority’s own document — the one we read to produce this record. Where a source publishes whole titles rather than sections, your browser may need a moment to jump to the provision.
Unofficial copy of government-published law, reproduced from official sources with full provenance. Not an official publication; verify against official sources before relying on it in a filing. Records in the 'guidance' corpus, and only that corpus, are sub-regulatory (interpretive guidelines, survey procedures) and are not binding law. Validity bounds follow each jurisdiction's declared temporalBasis.