NJ · jury_instructions
N.J. Model Criminal Jury Charge, N.J.S.A. 2C:3-9c
Reckless or Negligent Injury or Risk of Injury to Innocent Persons
Approved 3/30/82
RECKLESS OR NEGLIGENT INJURY OR RISK
OF INJURY TO INNOCENT PERSONS
(N.J.S.A. 2C:3-9c)
The defense has argued that the use of force against (Victim 1) was justified under the
law for the purpose of (insert one of the following):
Execution of public duty - 2C:3-3
Self-protection - 2C:3-4
Protection of other persons - 2C:3-5
Defense of premises or personal property - 2C:3-6
Law enforcement - 2C:3-7
Carrying out a special responsibility - 2C:3-8
The State has charged that in using force ag ainst (Victim 1) the defendant recklessly or
negligently injured or created a risk of injury to (Victim 2), an innocent person
.
A person is reckless in injuri ng or creating a risk of inju ry to an innocent person when
he/she consciously disregards a substantial and unjus tifiable risk that the injury or risk of injury
will result from his/her conduct. Th e risk must be of such a natu re and degree that, considering
the nature and purpose of the actor's conduct and the circumstances known to him/her, its
disregard involves a gross deviation from the standard of conduct that a reasonable-person would
observe in the actor's situation.1 In other words, if the defendant knew that it was very likely that
his/her use of force agains t (Victim 1) would injure or create a risk of injury to an innocent,
person, but he/she went ahead and used it anyway, where a reasonable person would not have
used force, then he/she acted recklessly.
A person is negligent 2 in injuring or creating a risk of injury to an innocent person when
he/she should be aware of a substant ial and unjustifiable risk that the injury or risk of injury will
result from his/her conduct. The risk must be of such a nature a nd degree that the actor's failure
to perceive it, considering th e nature and purpose of his/he r conduct and the circumstances
known to him/her, involves a gross deviation from the standard of ca re that a reasonable person
1 N.J.S.A. 2C:2-2 (3).
2 N.J.S.A. 2C:2-2(4).
RECKLESS OR NEGLIGENT INJURY OR RISK
OF INJURY TO INNOCENT PERSONS
(N.J.S.A. 2C:3-9c)
would observe in the actor's situa tion. In other words, if it were very likely that the defendant's
use of force against (Vic tim 1) would injure or create a risk of injury to an innocent person, and
given the circumstances, the defendant should have known that, but he/she went ahead and used
force anyway, where a reasonable person would not have used force, then he/she acted
negligently.
If you find that the defendant, in using force against (Victim 1) was either reckless or
negligent in injuring or creating a risk of injury to (Victim 2), then the fact that the defendant
might have been justified under th e law in acting agains t (Victim 1) cannot be used as a defense
to the charges as to (Victim 2).
History
Approved 3/30/82
Provenance
- Source
- njcourts.gov
- Retrieved
- 2026-08-20
- Edition
- 2026-08-20
- Content hash
41352a19406a538213132988e1ee0e5f36c170ff3aa6f2577180643fbbf7fbba
The link goes to the issuing authority’s own document — the one we read to produce this record. Where a source publishes whole titles rather than sections, your browser may need a moment to jump to the provision.
Unofficial copy of government-published law, reproduced from official sources with full provenance. Not an official publication; verify against official sources before relying on it in a filing. Records in the 'guidance' corpus, and only that corpus, are sub-regulatory (interpretive guidelines, survey procedures) and are not binding law. Validity bounds follow each jurisdiction's declared temporalBasis.