Bindinglaw

NJ · jury_instructions

N.J. Model Criminal Jury Charge, N.J.S.A. 2C:24-4b(5)(a)

Endangering the Welfare of a Child (Pornography)

activein force · 2007-01-08 – presentas-observed

Approved 1/8/07

ENDANGERING THE WELFARE OF A CHILD

(PORNOGRAPHY)

N.J.S.A. 2C:24-4b(5)(a)

Defendant is charged in count ______ of the indictment with endangering the welfare of a

child.

[READ COUNT OF INDICTMENT]

The statute under which this charge is based reads in pertinent part:

Any person who knowingly receives for the purpose of selling or who

knowingly sells, procures, manufact ures, gives, provides, lends,

trades, mails, delivers, transfers, publishes, distributes, circulates,

disseminates, presents, exhibits, advertises, offers or agrees to offer,

through any means, including the Internet, any photograph, film,

videotape, computer program or file, video game or any other

reproduction or reconstruction whic h depicts a child engaging in a

prohibited sexual act or in the simulation of such an act is guilty of a

crime.

In order to convict defendant of this charge , the State must prove the following elements

beyond a reasonable doubt:

1. That defendant [received for the pur pose of selling] [sold] [procured]

[manufactured][gave] [provided] [lent] [tra ded] [mailed] [delivered] [transferred]

[published] [distributed] [circulated] [disseminated] [presented] [exhibited] [offered]

[agreed to offer] through any means, including [choose appropriate] the Internet, any

photograph, film, videotape, computer progr am or file, video game or any other

reproduction or reconstruction of a child.

2. That defendant did so knowingly.

3. That the [child] [children] depicted in the [choose appropriate] photograph, film,

videotape, computer program or file, video game or any other reproduction or

reconstruction [was] [were] engaging in a prohibited sexual act or in the simulation

of such an act.

4. That defendant knew that the [child] [child ren] [was] [were] engaging in a prohibited

sexual act or in the simulation of such an act.

The first element that the State must prove beyond a reasonable doubt is that defendant

[received for the purpose of selling] [sold] [procu red] [manufactured][gave] [provided] [lent]

[traded] [mailed] [delivered] [t ransferred] [published] [distributed] [circulated] [disseminated]

ENDANGERING THE WELFARE

OF A CHILD (PORNOGRAPHY)

N.J.S.A. 2C:24-4b(5)(a)

[presented] [exhibited] [offered] [agreed to offe r] through any m eans, including the Internet, any

photograph, film, videotape, computer program or file, video game or any other reproduction or

reconstruction of a child.

A child means any person under the age of 16 years of age. The State must prove beyond a

reasonable doubt that the child[ren] was [were] under the age of 16 at the time of the offense. It is

not a defense that the defendant did not know that the child[ren] was [were] under the age of 16 or

that the defendant believed that the child[ren] was [were] 16 years old or older, even if such a

mistaken belief was reasonable.1

[USE IF DEFENDANT ASSERTS “VIRTUAL CHILD” DEFENSE]

A child means any person under the age of 16 years of age. The State must prove beyond a

reasonable doubt that the [child][children] [was] [were] under the age of 16 at the time of the

offense. Moreover, the State must prove beyond a reasonable doubt that the images in question were

of [a] real [child] [children] and that defendant knew that the images were of [a] real

[child][children].

2

It is not a defense that the defendant did not know that the [child][children] [was] [were]

under the age of 16 or that the defendant believed that the [child][children] [was] [were] 16 years old

or older, even if such a mistaken belief was reasonable.3

Reproduction means, but is not limited to, computer generated images.

[EXCEPT WHEN THE ALLEGATION IS RECEIVING FOR THE PURPOSE

OF SELLING, CHARGE THE FOLLOWING AS THE SECOND ELEMENT]

The second element that the State must prove beyond a reasonable doubt is that defendant

knowingly [sold] [procured] [manufactured][gave] [provided] [lent] [traded] [mailed] [delivered]

[transferred] [published] [distributed] [circulated] [disseminated] [presented] [exhibited] [offered]

[agreed to offer] through any means, including the Internet, any photograph, film, videotape,

computer program or file, video game or any other reproduction or reconstruction of a child.

A person acts knowingly with respect to the na ture of his/her conduct or the attendant

circumstances if he/she is aware that the conduct is of that nature or that such circumstances exist or

the person is aware of a high probability of their existence. A person acts knowingly with respect to

1 N.J.S.A. 2C:24-4b(6). See State v. Perez, 177 N.J. 540, 555 (2003).

2 State v. May, 362 N.J. Super. 572, 588 (App. Div. 2003).

3 N.J.S.A. 2C:24-4b(6). See State v. Perez, 177 N.J. 540, 555 (2003).

ENDANGERING THE WELFARE

OF A CHILD (PORNOGRAPHY)

N.J.S.A. 2C:24-4b(5)(a)

a result of the conduct if he/she is aware that it is practically certain that the conduct will cause a

result. “Knowing,” “with knowledge,” or equivalent terms have the same meaning.

Knowledge is a condition of the mind. It ca nnot be seen and can only be determined by

inference from defendant’s conduct, words or acts. A state of mind is rarely susceptible of direct

proof but must ordinarily be inferred from the facts. Therefore, it is not necessary that the State

produce witnesses to testify that an accused said that he/she had a certain state of mind when he/she

did a particular thing. It is within your power to find that such proof has been furnished beyond a

reasonable doubt by inference which may arise from the nature of his/her acts and conduct and from

all he/she said and did at the particul ar time and place and from all surrounding

circumstances established by the evidence.

[WHEN THE ALLEGATION IS RECE IVING FOR THE PURPOSE OF

SELLING, CHARGE THE FOLLOWING AS THE SECOND ELEMENT]

The second element that the State must prove beyond a reasonable doubt is that defendant

knowingly received for the purpose of selling th rough any means, including the Internet, any

photograph, film, videotape, computer program or file, video game or any other reproduction or

reconstruction of a child.

A person acts knowingly with respect to the na ture of his/her conduct or the attendant

circumstances if he/she is aware that the conduct is of that nature or that such circumstances exist or

the person is aware of a high probability of their existence. A person acts knowingly with respect to

a result of the conduct if he/she is aware that it is practically certain that the conduct will cause a

result. “Knowing,” “with knowledge,” or equivalent terms have the same meaning.

I have used the phrase “with purpose.” A person acts purposely with respect to the nature of

his/her conduct or the result of that conduct if it is his/her conscious object to engage in conduct of

that nature or to cause such a result. A person acts purposely with respect to attendant circumstances

if the person is aware of the existence of such ci rcumstances or believes or hopes that they exist.

“With purpose,” “designed,” “with design,” or equivalent terms have the same meaning.

Knowledge and purpose are conditions of the mind which cannot be seen and can only be

determined by inference from defendant’s conduct, words or acts. A state of mind is rarely

susceptible of direct proof but must ordinarily be inferred from the facts. Therefore, it is not

necessary that the State produce witnesses to testify that an accused said that he/she had a certain

ENDANGERING THE WELFARE

OF A CHILD (PORNOGRAPHY)

N.J.S.A. 2C:24-4b(5)(a)

state of mind when he/she did a particular thing. It is within your power to find that such proof has

been furnished beyond a reasonable doubt by inference which m

ay arise from the nature of his/her

acts and conduct and from all he/she said and di d at the particular time and place and from all

surrounding circumstances established by the evidence.

[CHARGE IN ALL CASES]

The third element that the State must prove beyond a reasonable doubt is that the [child]

[children] depicted in the photograph, film, videotape, computer program or file, video game or any

other reproduction or reconstructi on [was] [were] engaging in a prohibited sexual act or in the

simulation of such an act.

A prohibited sexual act means

[CHOOSE APPROPRIATE]

sexual intercourse, which is penetration, however slight, of the vagina by a penis.4

anal intercourse, which is penetration, however slight, into the anus.5

masturbation, which is stimulation of the genitals.6

bestiality, which is a sexual connection between a person and an animal.7

sadism, which is sexual gratification dependent largely on the infliction of pain on others.8

masochism, which is sexual gratification dependent largely on the infliction of physical or mental

abuse on the person.9

fellatio, which is oral contact with the male sexual organ.10

cunnilingus, which is oral contact with the female sex organ.11

nudity, if depicted for the purpose of sexual stimulation or gratification of any person who may view

such depiction.

vaginal intercourse, which is the penetration of the vagina, or [where appropriate] of the space

between the labia majora or outer lips of the vulva.

12

4 Hice v. State, 593 S.W.2d 57, 64 (Ark. 1980) and cases cited there.

5 State v. Gallagher, 286 N.J. Super. 1, 13 (App. Div. 1995), certif. denied, 146 N.J. 569 (1996).

6 People v. Lamb, 90 Cal. Rptr.2d 565, 576 (Ct. App. 1999)

7 State v. Bonynge, 450 N.W.2d 331, 338 (Minn. Ct. App. 1990).

8 Ex Parte Anderson, 902 S.W.2d 695, 700 (Tex. Ct. App. 1995).

9 Id. at 700.

10 State in the Interest of S.M., 284 N.J. Super. 611, 616-19 (App. Div. 1995).

11 State v. Fraction, 206 N.J. Super. 532, 535-36 (App. Div. 1985), certif. denied, 104 N.J. 434 (1986).

12 See State v. J.A., 337 N.J. Super. 114 (App. Div. 2001). The Appellate Division upheld the charge given by the trial

court in that case which included the following language which can be used if the circumstances of the specific case are

ENDANGERING THE WELFARE

OF A CHILD (PORNOGRAPHY)

N.J.S.A. 2C:24-4b(5)(a)

sexual penetration, which is insertion of the hand, finger or object into the anus or vagina, either by

the defendant or on the defendant’s instructions.13

sexual contact, which is an intentional touching by the victim or defendant, either directly or through

clothing, of the victim’s or defendant’s intimate parts for the purpose of degrading or humiliating the

victim or sexually arousing or sexually gratifying the defendant.14

The fourth element that the State must pr ove beyond a reasonable doubt is that defendant

knew that the [child] [children] depicted in the photograph, film, videotape, computer program or

file, video game or any other reproduction or reconstruction [was] [were] engaging in a prohibited

sexual act or in the simulation of such an act. I have already defined knowingly for you.

If you find that the State has proven each element beyond a reasonable doubt, then you must

find defendant guilty. If you find that the State has failed to prove any element beyond a reasonable

doubt, then you must find defendant not guilty.

appropriate: “This means that if you find from all of the evidence presented beyond a reasonable doubt that there was

[penile] penetration to the outer area of the vaginal opening, what is commonly referred to as the vaginal lips, that is

sufficient to establish penetration under the law.”

13 N.J.S.A. 2C:24-4b(1)(j) refers to “[a]ny act of sexual penetration or sexual contact as defined in N.J.S. 2C:14-1.”

Every other act of “penetration” referred to in N.J.S.A. 2C:14-1, except for vaginal intercourse, is set forth in the

definition of prohibited sexual act.

14 N.J.S.A. 2C:14-1d. See State v. J.A. , 337 N.J. Super. 114 (App. Div. 2001). The Appellate Division upheld the

charge given by the trial court in that case which included the following language which can be used if the circumstances

of the specific case are appropriate: “This means that if you find from all of the evidence presented beyond a reasonable

doubt that there was [penile] penetration to the outer area of the vaginal opening, what is commonly referred to as the

vaginal lips, that is sufficient to establish penetration under the law.”

History

Approved 1/8/07

Provenance

Source
njcourts.gov
Retrieved
2026-08-20
Edition
2026-08-20
Content hash
16017bffc27d177356e9a0f7e6c284a875997bdcc1bee2a81b71ae5cebabf16a
View the official source →

The link goes to the issuing authority’s own document — the one we read to produce this record. Where a source publishes whole titles rather than sections, your browser may need a moment to jump to the provision.

Unofficial copy of government-published law, reproduced from official sources with full provenance. Not an official publication; verify against official sources before relying on it in a filing. Records in the 'guidance' corpus, and only that corpus, are sub-regulatory (interpretive guidelines, survey procedures) and are not binding law. Validity bounds follow each jurisdiction's declared temporalBasis.

Coverage · API docs

Bindinglaw

Point-in-time US law with the receipt attached. Source URL, retrieval time, content hash, and validity dates on every answer.

curl api.binding.law/v1/law/coverage

© 2026 binding.law · a Jubal, Inc. productAttorneys and firms never pay. Ever.