NJ · jury_instructions
N.J. Model Criminal Jury Charge, N.J.S.A. 2C:33-11
Defacement or Damage of Property by Placement
Approved 6/20/96
DEFACEMENT OR DAMAGE OF PROPERTY B Y PLACEMENT OF
SYMBOL, OBJECT OR GRAFFITI
N.J.S.A. 2C:33-11
The ________________ count of the Indictment charges the defendant _____________,
with the crime of purposely defacing or damagi ng the property of another by placing a symbol,
object or graffiti on the property. The statute on which this count of the Indictment is based
reads in pertinent part:
A person is guilty of a crime if he purposely defaces or damages,
without authorization of the owner or tenant, any private premises,
or property primarily used for relig ious, educational, residential,
memorial, charitable, or cemetery purposes, or for assembly of
persons for purpose of exercising any right
guaranteed by law or
by Constitution of this State or of the United States by placing
thereon a symbol, an object, a ch aracterization, an appellation, or
graffiti that exposes another to threat of violence.
In order for you to find the defendant guilty of this charge, the St ate has the burden of
proving beyond a reasonable doubt each of the following four elements of this crime:
1. That the defendant purposely defaced or damaged a
(Choose the applicable clause)
a. private premises; or
b. property primarily used for
(1) religious purposes; or
(2) educational purposes; or
(3) residential purposes; or
(4) memorial purposes; or
(5) charitable purposes; or
(6) cemetery purposes; or
(7) assembly by persons for the purpose of exer cising any right
guaranteed by law or by Constitution of this State or the United
DEFACEMENT OR DAMAGE OF PROPERTY BY
PLACEMENT OF SYMBOL, OBJECT OR GRAFFITI
N.J.S.A.2C:33-11
States.
2. That the defendant acted without the authorization of the owner or tenant of the
property.
3. That the defendant damaged or de faced the property by placing thereon:
(choose the applicable description[s])
a. a symbol;
b. an object;
c. a characterization;
d. an appellation; or
e. graffiti
4. That the symbol, object, characterization, appellation or graffiti placed on the
property by the defendant exposed another to the threat of violence.
In each of the four elements that I have ju st outlined to you, I have used certain words
which I will now define for you. In the first el ement, I stated that the defendant must act
“purposely” or “with purpose.” A person acts pur posely with respect to the nature of his/her
conduct or a result thereof it is hi s/her conscious object to engage in conduct of that nature or to
cause such a result. A person acts purposely with respect to the attendan t circumstances if the
individual is aware of the existence of such ci rcumstances or the individual believes or hopes
that they exist. One can be deemed to be acting purposely if one acts with design, with a
purpose, or with a particular object. In other words, did the defendant really mean to do what
he/she did?
There are other words used in the four elements that I will define for you:
(Choose the appropriate phrases applicable to the facts of the case)
DEFACEMENT OR DAMAGE OF PROPERTY BY
PLACEMENT OF SYMBOL, OBJECT OR GRAFFITI
N.J.S.A.2C:33-11
In the first element:
1. To deface means: To spoil the surface or appearance; or to impair the usefulness
or value.
2. To damage is: To detrimentally a ffect the quality or utility of property.
In the second element:
1. Authorization is: To r eceive approval or permission.
In the third element:
1. Symbol is: Something that represents something else by recognizable association,
resemblance or convention.
2. An object is: Something perceptible, especially to the sens e of vision or touch.
3. Characterization is: A description or representation of a pe rson’s qualities or
peculiarities.
4. Appellation is: A name or title.
5. Graffiti is: A drawing, slur or inscription scratched on a wall or other surface.
In the fourth element:
1. A threat is: An indication exposing one to a fear of imminent or impending danger
or harm.
2. Violence is: Physical force exerted for the purpose of violating, damaging or
abusing.
The State must prove beyond a reasonable doubt al l four of the elements that constitute
this offense. If you are satisfied, beyond a reas onable doubt, that the State has proven each and
every one of the elements of this offense, as I have defined them, then you must find the
defendant guilty. However, if you find that th e State has failed to prove, beyond a reasonable
doubt, any one or more of the elements of this offense as I have defined them, then you must find
DEFACEMENT OR DAMAGE OF PROPERTY BY
PLACEMENT OF SYMBOL, OBJECT OR GRAFFITI
N.J.S.A.2C:33-11
the defendant not guilty.
History
Approved 6/20/96
Provenance
- Source
- njcourts.gov
- Retrieved
- 2026-08-20
- Edition
- 2026-08-20
- Content hash
e5001e8ed49d7cd9689c51654afa3e8526cc15229ccde42e5f00e11df6e16e6f
The link goes to the issuing authority’s own document — the one we read to produce this record. Where a source publishes whole titles rather than sections, your browser may need a moment to jump to the provision.
Unofficial copy of government-published law, reproduced from official sources with full provenance. Not an official publication; verify against official sources before relying on it in a filing. Records in the 'guidance' corpus, and only that corpus, are sub-regulatory (interpretive guidelines, survey procedures) and are not binding law. Validity bounds follow each jurisdiction's declared temporalBasis.