NJ · jury_instructions
N.J. Model Criminal Jury Charge, N.J.S.A. 2C:35-13
Obtaining a CDS by Fraud
Approved 10/17/88
OBTAINING A CONTROLLED DANGEROUS SUBSTANCE BY FRAUD
(N.J.S.A. 2C:35-13)
The defendant is charged with obtaining a controlled dangerous substance by fraud. The
applicable statute reads in pertinent part:
It shall be unlawful for any pers on to acquire or obtain possession
of a controlled dangerous substa nce . . . by misrepresentation,
fraud, forgery, deception or subterfuge.1
To obtain a conviction on this charge the St ate must prove each of the following elements
beyond a reasonable doubt:
(1) That defendant acquired or obtaine d possession of a controlled dangerous
substance;
(2) That defendant did so by misrepresentation, fraud, forgery, deception or
subterfuge; and
(3) That defendant acted knowingly. 2
Possession is a knowing intentional contro l of a designated thing, accompanied by a
knowledge of its character. Controlled dangerous substances are defined by statute and
specifically include .
Misrepresentation means a false or incorrect account, explanation or presentation. Fraud
is an intentional deception designed to cause a pe rson to give up property or some other lawful
right. Forgery is the intentional and unauthorized alteration, change, creation, completion,
execution, authentication, issuance or transfer of any writing. Deception is the purposeful
creation or reinforcement of a false impressio n, or the prevention of another from acquiring
information which would affect that person's judgment of a transaction, or the failure to correct a
false impression which was previously created or re inforced. Subterfuge is any plan or action,
device or artifice used to evade the truth.
1 By its terms, the statute also applies to any "controlled substance analog." This should be incorporated into
the charge in appropriate cases. A definition for a "controlled substance analog" can be found in N.J.S.A. 2C:35-2.
It should be noted that the statute also makes it unlawful "for any person to acquire or obtain possession of
a forged or fraudulent certificate of destruction required pursuant to N.J.S.A. 2C:35-21. "This Model Charge is not
intended to cover such a situation.
2 N.J.S.A. 2C:2-2c(3).
OBTAINING A CONTROLLED DANGEROUS SUBSTANCE
BY FRAUD
(N.J.S.A. 2C:35-13)
A person acts knowingly with respect to the nature of his/her conduct or the attendant
circumstances if the person is aware that his/he r conduct is of that nature, or that such
circumstances exist, or the person is aware of a high probability of their existence. A person acts
knowingly with respect to a result of his/her conduc t if the person is aware that it is practically
certain that his/her conduct will cause such a result.
Thus, a conviction for the crime of obtaini ng a controlled dangerous substance by fraud
would require proof beyond a re asonable doubt that the defe ndant acquired or obtained
possession of a controlled dangerous substance, that he/she did so by fraudulent means, and that
he/she acted knowingly, as I have defined these terms for you.
If you find that the State has failed to prove anyone or more of these elements of the
crime beyond a reasonable doubt, then you must find the defendant Not Guilty of obtaining a
controlled dangerous substance by fraud. On the other hand, if you find that the State has proved
all of the elements of the crime beyond a reas onable doubt, then you must find the defendant
Guilty as charged.
History
Approved 10/17/88
Provenance
- Source
- njcourts.gov
- Retrieved
- 2026-08-20
- Edition
- 2026-08-20
- Content hash
bd838a0bb9611cfee01257f7c36cc606156473da4c9e9c03f1bf84153b1dce5f
The link goes to the issuing authority’s own document — the one we read to produce this record. Where a source publishes whole titles rather than sections, your browser may need a moment to jump to the provision.
Unofficial copy of government-published law, reproduced from official sources with full provenance. Not an official publication; verify against official sources before relying on it in a filing. Records in the 'guidance' corpus, and only that corpus, are sub-regulatory (interpretive guidelines, survey procedures) and are not binding law. Validity bounds follow each jurisdiction's declared temporalBasis.