Bindinglaw

NJ · jury_instructions

N.J. Model Criminal Jury Charge, N.J.S.A. 2C:27-2

Bribery in Official and Political Matters (Recipient)

activein force · 2011-02-14 – presentas-observed

Revised 2/14/11

BRIBERY IN OFFICIAL AND POLITICAL MATTERS

(BRIBE RECIPIENT)

(N.J.S.A. 2C:27-2)

Count ________ of the indictment charges defendant with the crime of bribery.

[READ COUNT OF INDICTMENT]

That statute reads in pertinent part as follows:

A person is guilty of bribery if he directly or indirectly solicits,

accepts or agrees to accept from another:

(a) Any benefit as consideration for a decision, opinion,

recommendation, vote or exercise of discretion as a public

servant, party official or voter on any public issue or in any

public election.

(or)

(b) Any benefit as consideration for a decision, vote,

recommendation or exercise of official discretion in a judicial

or administrative proceeding.

(or)

(c) Any benefit as consideration for a violation of an official duty

of a public servant or party official.

(or)

(d) Any benefit as considerati on for the performance of official

duties.

In order for you to find the defendant guilty of the crime of bribery, the State must prove the

following elements beyond a reasonable doubt:

1. That the defendant directly or indirec tly solicited, accepted or agreed to accept a

benefit from another.

2. CHOOSE AS APPROPRIATE

BRIBERY IN OFFICIAL AND POLITICAL MATTERS

(BRIBE RECIPIENT)

(N.J.S.A. 2C:27-2)

That the defendant did so as c onsideration for a decision, opinion,

r

ecommendation, vote or exercise of official discretion of (defendant

himself/herself or a third party) as a public servant (party official)

(voter) on a public issue or in any public election.

(or)

that the defendant did so as consideration for a decision, vote,

recommendation or exercise of offi cial discretion of (defendant

himself/herself or a third party) in a (judicial) or (administrative)

proceeding.

(or)

that the defendant did so as consideration for (defendant

himself/herself or a third party), as a public servant (party official)

violating an official duty.

(or)

that the defendant did so as consideration for (defendant or a third

party)’s performance of official duties.

3. That defendant acted purposely.

The first element that the State must prove beyond a reasonable doubt is that the defendant

directly or indirectly solicited, accepted or agreed to accept a benefit.

“Benefit” means gain or advantage, or anyt hing regarded by the beneficiary as gain or

advantage, including a pecuniary benefit or a benefit to any other person or entity in whose welfare

he/she is interested.

1 “Benefit as consideration” means any benefit not authorized by law.

[CHARGE IF PECUNIARY BENEFIT IS ALLEGED]

“Pecuniary benefit” is benefit in the form of money, property, commercial interests or

anything else the primary significance of which is economic gain.2

[CHARGE IF APPLICABLE]

It is no defense to bribery that a person who solicited, accepted or agreed to accept a benefit

1 N.J.S.A. 2C:27-1a.

2 N.J.S.A. 2C:27-1f.

BRIBERY IN OFFICIAL AND POLITICAL MATTERS

(BRIBE RECIPIENT)

(N.J.S.A. 2C:27-2)

did so as a result of conduct by another constituting theft by extortion or coercion or an attem pt to

commit either of those crimes.

The second element that the State must prove beyond a reasonable doubt is:

[CHOOSE AS APPROPRIATE]

That the defendant did so as c onsideration for a decision, opinion,

recommendation, vote or exercise of official discretion of (defendant

himself/herself or a third party) as a public servant (party official)

(voter) on a public issue or in any public election.

(or)

that the defendant did so as consideration for a decision, vote,

recommendation or exercise of offi cial discretion of (defendant

himself/herself or a third party) in a (judicial) or (administrative)

proceeding.

(or)

that the defendant did so as consideration for (defendant

himself/herself or a third party), as a public servant (party official)

violating an official duty.

(or)

that the defendant did so as consideration for (defendant

himself/herself or a third party)’s performance of official duties.

“Consideration” means some right, interest or profit accruing to one party.

3

[CHOOSE AS APPLICABLE]

“Public servant” means any officer or employee of government, including legislators and

judges, and any person participating as juror, advi sor, consultant or otherwise, in performing a

governmental function, but the term does not include witnesses.4 “Government” means any branch,

subdivision or agency of the government of the state or any locality within it.5

“Party official” means a person who holds an elective or appointive post in a political party

in the United States by virtue of which he/she directs or conducts, or participates in directing or

3 Black’s Law Dictionary (5th ed).

4 N.J.S.A. 2C:27-1e.

BRIBERY IN OFFICIAL AND POLITICAL MATTERS

(BRIBE RECIPIENT)

(N.J.S.A. 2C:27-2)

conducting party affairs at any level or responsibility.6

“Administrative proceeding” means any proceeding, other than a judicial proceeding, the

outcome of which is required to be based on a record or documentation prescribed by law, or in

which law or regulation is particularized in application to individuals.7

[CHARGE IN ALL CASES]

The third element that the State must prove beyond a reasonable doubt is that defendant acted

purposely. A person acts purposely with respect to the nature of his/her conduct or a result thereof if

it is his/her conscious object to engage in conduct of that nature or to cause such a result. Purpose,

with purpose, and similar words have the same meaning. In other words, in order for you to find that

the defendant acted purposely, the State must prove beyond a reasonable doubt that it was the

defendant's conscious object at the time he/she committed an unlawful act.

Purpose is a state or a condition of the mind which cannot be seen and can only be

determined by inferences from conduct, words or acts. A state of mind is rarely susceptible of direct

proof, but must ordinarily be inferred from the facts. Therefore, it is not necessary, members of the

jury, that witnesses be produced to testify that an accused said he/she had a certain state of mind

when he/she engaged in a particular act. His/Her state of mind may be gathered from his/her acts

and his/her conduct, and from all he/she said and did at the particular time and place, and from all of

the surrounding circumstances.

If you find that the State has proved each of these three elements beyond a reasonable doubt,

you must find the defendant guilty of bribery. If the State has failed to prove any of these elements

5 N.J.S.A. 2C:27-1b.

6 N.J.S.A. 2C:27-1g.

7 N.J.S.A. 2C:27-1h.

BRIBERY IN OFFICIAL AND POLITICAL MATTERS

(BRIBE RECIPIENT)

(N.J.S.A. 2C:27-2)

beyond a reasonable doubt, you must find the defendant not guilty.

[IF THE STATE ALLEGES THAT THE BENEFIT IS PECUNIARY, ADD]8

If the State has proved each element of the crime beyond a reasonable doubt, you must determine the

value of the pecuniary benefit involved. “Pecuniar y benefit” is benefit in the form of money,

property, commercial interests or anything else the primary significance of which is economic gain.

The State must prove beyond a reasonable doubt that the value of the pecuniary benefit involved [IF

APPROPRIATE, ADD: for each specific inst ance concerning which you have reached a

verdict of guilty] exceeds $200.

8 If a particular case involves an allegation of receipt of a pecuniary benefit and a non-pecuniary

benefit, there should be separate interrogatories on the verdict sheet as to each type of benefit. This is because

bribery is a crime of the second degree unless the value of the pecuniary benefit is $200 or less.

History

Revised 2/14/11

Provenance

Source
njcourts.gov
Retrieved
2026-08-20
Edition
2026-08-20
Content hash
90190331b7ebe1e0ab94b28d4bd9d5734eb358a3a8565a600dfbc43f79badfea
View the official source →

The link goes to the issuing authority’s own document — the one we read to produce this record. Where a source publishes whole titles rather than sections, your browser may need a moment to jump to the provision.

Unofficial copy of government-published law, reproduced from official sources with full provenance. Not an official publication; verify against official sources before relying on it in a filing. Records in the 'guidance' corpus, and only that corpus, are sub-regulatory (interpretive guidelines, survey procedures) and are not binding law. Validity bounds follow each jurisdiction's declared temporalBasis.

Coverage · API docs

Bindinglaw

Point-in-time US law with the receipt attached. Source URL, retrieval time, content hash, and validity dates on every answer.

curl api.binding.law/v1/law/coverage

© 2026 binding.law · a Jubal, Inc. productAttorneys and firms never pay. Ever.