NJ · jury_instructions
N.J. Model Criminal Jury Charge, N.J.S.A. Non 2C
Attempted Suicide II
Approved 9/10/12
ATTEMPTED SUICIDE - II
[TO AVOID PROSECUTION AS CONSCIOUSNESS OF GUILT]1
[The following should be used where the defendant has not denied that he/she attempted
suicide but has offered an explanation for the attempted suicide]
There has been some testimony in the case from which you may infer that the defendant
attempted suicide after the alleged commission of the crime(s). The defendant does not dispute that
he/she attempted suicide but indicates his/her actions were the result of the following:
(Set forth explanation suggested by the defense)
The question of whether the defendant attempted suicide after the commission of the alleged
crime is another question of fact for your determination. A suicide attempt to avoid arrest or
prosecution may, in some circumstances, reveal a defendant’s consciousness of guilt.2
However, a defendant’s psychological, social or financial situation may underlie a suicide
attempt.3 If you accept any explanation offered by the defendant, you may not infer consciousness of
guilt from the evidence of a suicide attempt. If you find that the defendant, fearing that an accusation
or arrest would be made against him/her on the charge(s) involved in the indictment 4, attempted
suicide for the purpose of evading the accusation or arrest on [that] [those] charge(s), then you may
consider such attempted suicide in connection with all the other evidence in the case, as an indication
or proof of consciousness of guilt.
Accusation and the threat of prosecution and punishment may impel a defendant to attempt
suicide. Alternatively, an urge to confess or repent for a guilty deed may materialize as an admission
by suicidal conduct. However, other factors may motivate or contribute to an accused’s decision to
attempt suicide. Instead of seeking to avoid punishment, a defendant who attempts suicide may, for
reasons unrelated to the crime(s) charged, and for the reasons presented by the defense, decide to
attempt to end his/he r own life. The explanation offered by the defendant may account for any
1 Pursuant to State v. Mann, 132 N.J. 410, 423 (1993), “a trial court ordinarily should hold an [N.J.R.E.
104(a)] hearing to determine whether evidence of a defendant’s suicide attempt is sufficient to support a
reasonable inference that the suicide attempt was prompted by a desire to avoid the ordeal of prosecution and
punishment or was otherwise evidence of consciousness of guilt.”
2 State v. Mann, ibid.
3 Ibid.
4 If evidence of an alleged suicide attempt occurs after indictment or during the course of a trial, please
modify the language of this charge to reflect that the evidence is being introduced as consciousness of guilt to
avoid the consequences of the pending indictment or prosecution.
ATTEMPTED SUICIDE – II
[TO AVOID PROSECUTION AS
CONSCIOUSNESS OF GUILT]
actions taken or wounds sustained by a defendant.5
You must first find whether or not an actual suicide attempt occurred.6 If you find that it did,
you must next consider whether t hat attempt was made to avoid the burdens of prosecution and
punishment.7 You should also determine whether the defendant’s attempted suicide demonstrated
consciousness of guilt.8 If you accept the explanation offered by the defendant, you may not infer
consciousness of guilt from the evidence of the suicide attempt.9
If you find that the defendant, fearing that an accusation or arrest would be made against
him/her on the charge(s) involved in the indictment, attempted suicide for the purpose of evading the
accusation or arrest on that charge, then you may consider such attempted suicide in connection with
all the other evidence in the case, only as an indication of consciousness of guilt and for no other
purpose.10 If, on the other hand, you accept any explanation offered by the defendant, you may not
infer consciousness of guilt from the evidence of a suicide attempt and may not use that evidence of
the suicide attempt against the defendant for any purpose.11
5 Id. at 422-23.
6 Id. at 424.
7 Ibid.
8 Ibid.
9 Ibid.
10 Id. at 421 (quoting the Model Jury Charges, Criminal - Flight (Nov. 1991)).
11 Id. at 424.
History
Approved 9/10/12
Provenance
- Source
- njcourts.gov
- Retrieved
- 2026-08-20
- Edition
- 2026-08-20
- Content hash
5d5b60e383f35663a9a0249eb295b44b3c72d1818e1a907a7172ae6feb2ca0df
The link goes to the issuing authority’s own document — the one we read to produce this record. Where a source publishes whole titles rather than sections, your browser may need a moment to jump to the provision.
Unofficial copy of government-published law, reproduced from official sources with full provenance. Not an official publication; verify against official sources before relying on it in a filing. Records in the 'guidance' corpus, and only that corpus, are sub-regulatory (interpretive guidelines, survey procedures) and are not binding law. Validity bounds follow each jurisdiction's declared temporalBasis.