NJ · jury_instructions
N.J. Model Criminal Jury Charge, N.J.S.A. 2C:12-1b(6)
Aggravated Assault - Unlawful taking of a motor vehicle
Approved 12/13/99
AGGRAVATED ASSAULT - UNLAWFUL TAKING
OF A MOTOR VEHICLE
(N.J.S.A. 2C:12-1b(6))
The defendant (Name) is charged in count with the crime of aggravated assault.
The indictment alleges:
(READ APPROPRIATE COUNT OF INDICTMENT)
The statute upon which this charge is based provides:
A person is guilty of aggravated as sault if he causes bodily injury
to another person while operating a motor vehicle in violation of
[another statute defining the offe nse of unlawful taking of a motor
vehicle]...
In order for you to find the defendant guilt y of this crime the State must prove the
following elements beyond a reasonable doubt:
1. That defendant caused bodily injury to another person;
a n d
2. That defendant did so while opera ting a motor vehicle in violation
of the statute defining the unlawful taking of a motor vehicle.
Bodily injury is defined as physical pain, illness or any impairment of physical
condition.
1 In order to find that the defendant caus ed bodily injury to (victim), you must find
beyond a reasonable doubt, first, th at (victim) would not have b een injured but for defendant's
conduct, and, second, that the bod ily injury was a probable cons equence of the defendant's
conduct.2 A probable consequence is one which is not too remote, accidental in its occurrence or
too dependent on the conduct of another to have a just bearing on defendant's liability or the
gravity of his offense.
3
1 N.J.S.A. 2C:11-1a.
2 N.J.S.A. 2C:2-3e.
3 State v. Martin, 119 N.J. 2 (1990).
AGGRAVATED ASSAULT - UNLAWFUL
TAKING OF A MOTOR VEHICLE
(N.J.S.A. 2C:12-1b(6))
A person violates the statute defining the unl awful taking of a motor vehicle for these
purposes if he/she, with purpose to withhold te mporarily from the owner, operates a motor
vehicle without the consent of the owner or other person authorized to give consent.4
In conclusion, the two elements the State must prove beyond a reasonable doubt are:
1. That defendant caused bodily injury to another person;
a n d
2. That defendant did so while opera ting a motor vehicle in violation
of the statute defining the unlawful taking of a motor vehicle.
If you are satisfied that th e State has proven both of these elements beyond a reasonable
doubt, then you must find the defendant guilty of a ggravated assault. However, if you are not
convinced that each of the elements has been proven beyond a reasonable doubt, then you must
find the defendant not guilty.
4 N.J.S.A. 2C:20-10b.
History
Approved 12/13/99
Provenance
- Source
- njcourts.gov
- Retrieved
- 2026-08-20
- Edition
- 2026-08-20
- Content hash
e3d89e80cacf1c8e71974f6133d202999a0b8b17e78ccf6ac9862b6996c1704d
The link goes to the issuing authority’s own document — the one we read to produce this record. Where a source publishes whole titles rather than sections, your browser may need a moment to jump to the provision.
Unofficial copy of government-published law, reproduced from official sources with full provenance. Not an official publication; verify against official sources before relying on it in a filing. Records in the 'guidance' corpus, and only that corpus, are sub-regulatory (interpretive guidelines, survey procedures) and are not binding law. Validity bounds follow each jurisdiction's declared temporalBasis.