NJ · jury_instructions
N.J. Model Criminal Jury Charge, N.J.S.A. 2C:12-1b(6)
Aggravated Assault - While fleeing or attempting to elude a law enforcement officer
Approved 12/13/99
AGGRAVATED ASSAULT - WHILE FLEEING OR
ATTEMPTING TO ELUDE A LAW ENFORCEMENT OFFICER
(N.J.S.A. 2C:12-1b(6))
The defendant (Name) is charged in count with the crime of aggravated assault.
The indictment alleges:
(READ APPROPRIATE COUNT OF INDICTMENT)
The statute upon which this charge is based provides:
A person is guilty of aggravated as sault if he causes bodily injury
to another person while fleeing or attempting to elude a law
enforcement officer in violation of [another statute defining the
offense of eluding]...
In order for you to find the defendant guilt y of this crime the State must prove the
following elements beyond a reasonable doubt:
1. That defendant caused bodily injury to another person;
a n d
2. That defendant did so while fleeing or attempting to elude a law
enforcement officer in violati on of the statute defining the eluding
o f f e n s e .
Bodily injury is defined as physical pain, illness or any impairment of physical
condition.
1 In order to find that the defendant caus ed bodily injury to (victim), you must find
beyond a reasonable doubt, first, th at (victim) would not have b een injured but for defendant's
conduct, and, second, that the bodily injury wa s a probable consequence of the defendant’s
conduct.2 A probable consequence is one which is not too remote, accidental in its occurrence or
too dependent on the conduct of another to have a just bearing on defendant's liability or the
gravity of his offense.
3
1 N.J.S.A. 2C:11-1a.
2 N.J.S.A. 2C:2-3e.
3 State v. Martin, 119 N.J. 2 (1990).
AGGRAVATED ASSAULT - WHILE FLEEING OR
ATTEMPTING TO ELUDE A LAW ENFORCEMENT OFFICER
N.J.S.A. 2C:12-1b(6)
I have already instructed you on the cr ime of eluding, and you should apply those
instructions here to determine whether th e State has proven beyond a reasonable doubt that
defendant was fleeing or attempting to elude a law enforcement officer.4
In conclusion, the two elements the State must prove beyond a reasonable doubt are:
1. That defendant caused bodily injury to another person;
a n d
2. That defendant did so while fl eeing or attempting to elude a law
enforcement officer in violati on of the statute defining the eluding
o f f e n s e .
If you are satisfied that th e State has proven both of these elements beyond a reasonable
doubt, then you must find the defenda nt guilty of aggravated assa ult. However, if you are not
convinced that each of the elements has been proven beyond a reasonable doubt, then you must
find the defendant not guilty.
4 This charge is drafted for the typical situation in which the predicate offense of eluding a law enforcement
officer in violation of N.J.S.A. 2C:29-2b will also have been charged in the indictment. In other situations, the
charge will have to be modified to incorporate the eluding charge in full.
History
Approved 12/13/99
Provenance
- Source
- njcourts.gov
- Retrieved
- 2026-08-20
- Edition
- 2026-08-20
- Content hash
7026f4ca1cd0e1cd4d2507e20b9d832cb4185c258830f504a371747e001469ee
The link goes to the issuing authority’s own document — the one we read to produce this record. Where a source publishes whole titles rather than sections, your browser may need a moment to jump to the provision.
Unofficial copy of government-published law, reproduced from official sources with full provenance. Not an official publication; verify against official sources before relying on it in a filing. Records in the 'guidance' corpus, and only that corpus, are sub-regulatory (interpretive guidelines, survey procedures) and are not binding law. Validity bounds follow each jurisdiction's declared temporalBasis.