NJ · jury_instructions
N.J. Model Civil Jury Charge 5.74
Duty Of Teachers And School Personnel To Student
5.74 DUTY OF TEACHERS AND SCHOOL PERSONNEL TO
STUDENT (Approved 9/80)
School personnel owe a duty to exercise reasonable care for the safety of
students entrusted to them. This duty extends to supervisory care required for
the student’s safety or well-being as well as to reasonable care for the student at
school-sponsored activities in which the student participates.
The standard of care is that degr ee of care which a person of ordinary
prudence, charged with comparable duties, would exercise under the
circumstances.1
The duty may be violated not only by the commission of acts but also in
the neglect or failure to act.
The theory behind the duty is that the relationship between the child and
school authorities is not a voluntary one but is compelled by law. The child
must attend school and is subject to school rules and discipline. In turn, the
school authorities are obligated to take reasonable precautions for his/her safety
and well-being.2
1 Caltavutro v. Passaic, 124 N.J. Super. 361 at 366 (App. Div. 1973).
2 Jackson v. Hankinson & Bd. of Ed. of Shrewsbury, 51 N.J. 230 (1968).
The school personnel are accountable fo r injuries resulting from failure to
discharge that duty.
A teacher owes his/her pupils the dut y of supervision and will be liable
for injuries caused by failure to discharge that duty with reasonable care.
3
3 Titus v. Lindberg, 49 N.J. 66 (1967).
History
(Approved 9/80)
Provenance
- Source
- njcourts.gov
- Retrieved
- 2026-08-20
- Edition
- 2026-08-20
- Content hash
5f6f6b5c55ea9fd4e6d0d9eedc940340db893c6db970e7a38decce2d04bc68c8
The link goes to the issuing authority’s own document — the one we read to produce this record. Where a source publishes whole titles rather than sections, your browser may need a moment to jump to the provision.
Unofficial copy of government-published law, reproduced from official sources with full provenance. Not an official publication; verify against official sources before relying on it in a filing. Records in the 'guidance' corpus, and only that corpus, are sub-regulatory (interpretive guidelines, survey procedures) and are not binding law. Validity bounds follow each jurisdiction's declared temporalBasis.