Bindinglaw

NJ · jury_instructions

N.J. Model Civil Jury Charge 4.30C

Builder Fails To Prove Substantial Performance And Sues In Quasi‑Contract

activein force · 1998-05-01 – presentas-observed

4.30C BUILDER FAILS TO PROVE SUBSTANTIAL

PERFORMANCE AND SUES IN QUASI-CONTRACT

(Approved 5/98)

Even if the builder in a constructi on contract fails to prove substantial

performance, (even if his/her default unde r the contract is willful) he/she may

recover compensation if the benefit which he/she conf erred upon the owner

exceeds the harm which he/she caused the owner, provided the owner accepted or

retained the benefit of the partial performance. In such case the builder is entitled

to recover the reasonable value of th e work performed by the builder after

deducting from it the loss caused by the builder’s breach which can include

increases in the cost of completion, losses resulting from delays, or harm caused by

below-par performance. However, the reasonable value may not be greater than

the proportion of the contract price wh ich the reasonable value of the work

completed bears to the reasonable value of all the work contemplated by the

contract.

Cases:

Kutzin v. Pirnie, 124 N.J. 500 (1991); Power-Matics, Inc. v. Ligotti,

79 N.J. Super. 294 (App. Div. 1963); and Restatement (Second) of

Contracts, Sec. 374 (1981).

History

(Approved 5/98)

Provenance

Source
njcourts.gov
Retrieved
2026-08-20
Edition
2026-08-20
Content hash
2f3185ef0dcb4df05bcb68220f992bade9bc1dbf10b8d919a618cc4a30f29ecc
View the official source →

The link goes to the issuing authority’s own document — the one we read to produce this record. Where a source publishes whole titles rather than sections, your browser may need a moment to jump to the provision.

Unofficial copy of government-published law, reproduced from official sources with full provenance. Not an official publication; verify against official sources before relying on it in a filing. Records in the 'guidance' corpus, and only that corpus, are sub-regulatory (interpretive guidelines, survey procedures) and are not binding law. Validity bounds follow each jurisdiction's declared temporalBasis.

Coverage · API docs

Bindinglaw

Point-in-time US law with the receipt attached. Source URL, retrieval time, content hash, and validity dates on every answer.

curl api.binding.law/v1/law/coverage

© 2026 binding.law · a Jubal, Inc. productAttorneys and firms never pay. Ever.