NJ · jury_instructions
N.J. Model Civil Jury Charge 4.10B
Third Party Beneficiary
4.10 BILATERAL CONTRACTS
B. THIRD PARTY BENEFICIARY (Approved 5/98)
Ordinarily a person may not sue for br each of a contract unless the person
is a party to the contract. However, pe rsons may enter into a contract for the
benefit of others. But, a person not a party to a contract may not sue to enforce it
merely because he/she happens to be incidentally benefited by it. Rather, it must
appear that the contract was made by the parties with the intention to benefit the
plaintiff and provide him/he r with enforceable rights. Thus, to establish that
plaintiff is entitled to en force this contract, the plai ntiff must prove that the
original parties to the contract intended the plaintiff to receive a direct benefit
from the contract.
If that intent did not exist, then the plaintiff cannot sue the defendant. It is
not necessary that an intended benefici ary be specifically identified in the
contact. But if the contract does not sp ecifically identify the plaintiff, it is
necessary to examine the pertinent provisions of the contract and the
surrounding circumstances to find whether the parties intended the plaintiff to
receive a direct benefit from the contract.
Cases:
Brooklawn v. Brooklawn Housing Corp. , 124 N.J.L. 73 (E. & A.
1940); Broadway Maintenance Corp. v. Rutgers , 90 N.J. 253
(1982); Worrmann v. Aratusa Ltd. , 266 N.J. Super 471 (App. Div.
1993).
History
(Approved 5/98)
Provenance
- Source
- njcourts.gov
- Retrieved
- 2026-08-20
- Edition
- 2026-08-20
- Content hash
578fb8b633b62cdc612fc8f97cf3ad6c63bcca2db59cbf918b8ad76ba1593c75
The link goes to the issuing authority’s own document — the one we read to produce this record. Where a source publishes whole titles rather than sections, your browser may need a moment to jump to the provision.
Unofficial copy of government-published law, reproduced from official sources with full provenance. Not an official publication; verify against official sources before relying on it in a filing. Records in the 'guidance' corpus, and only that corpus, are sub-regulatory (interpretive guidelines, survey procedures) and are not binding law. Validity bounds follow each jurisdiction's declared temporalBasis.