NH · rules
N.H. Cir. Ct. Prob. Div. R. 79
INTERLOCUTORY TRANSFERS AND APPEALS TO THE SUPREME COURT - Procedure
Whenever any question of law is to be transferred by interlocutory appeal from a ruling or by interlocutory transfer without ruling, the moving Party shall file with the Register the interlocutory appeal statement or interlocutory transfer statement pursuant to Supreme Court Rule 8 or Supreme Court Rule 9, and after the Court has signed the statement, the moving Party shall file the number of copies required by the rules of the Supreme Court with the clerk thereof.
After a decision on the merits, all appeals shall be deemed waived and judgment shall become final on the thirty-first day from the date on the Register's written notice of the decision, unless the party aggrieved enters a notice of appeal in the Supreme Court within thirty (30) days from the date on the Register's notice, pursuant to Supreme Court Rule 7, and files the number of copies required by the rules of the Supreme Court with the clerk thereof. The definition of "decision on the merits" includes decisions on Motions made after an order, opinion, or decree. Timely filed post-trial Motions stay the running of the appeal period.
Whenever any notice of appeal is filed pursuant to the provisions of RSA 567-A, the appealing Party shall give notice thereof forthwith to all Parties or to their Attorneys in accordance with rules of the Supreme Court.
Provenance
- Source
- www.courts.nh.gov
- Retrieved
- 2026-09-17
- Edition
- 2026-09-16
- Content hash
9673117bc7842025e0bb67f3d8ab3dcefe96423e84213574114daeceb17c09e7
The link goes to the issuing authority’s own document — the one we read to produce this record. Where a source publishes whole titles rather than sections, your browser may need a moment to jump to the provision.
Unofficial copy of government-published law, reproduced from official sources with full provenance. Not an official publication; verify against official sources before relying on it in a filing. Records in the 'guidance' corpus, and only that corpus, are sub-regulatory (interpretive guidelines, survey procedures) and are not binding law. Validity bounds follow each jurisdiction's declared temporalBasis.