NE · rules
Neb. Rev. Code of Judicial Conduct § 5-302.5
Competence, diligence, and cooperation
(A) A judge shall perform judicial and administrative duties, competently and diligently.
(B) A judge shall cooperate with other judges and court officials in the administration of court business.
History
COMMENT [1] Competence in the performance of judicial duties requires the legal knowledge, skill, thoroughness, and preparation reasonably necessary to perform a judge's responsibilities of judicial office. [2] A judge should seek the necessary docket time, court staff, expertise, and resources to discharge all adjudicative and administrative responsibilities. [3] Prompt disposition of the court's business requires a judge to devote adequate time to judicial duties, to be punctual in attending court and expeditious in determining matters under submission, and to take reasonable measures to ensure that court officials, litigants, and their lawyers cooperate with the judge to that end. [4] In disposing of matters promptly and efficiently, a judge must demonstrate due regard for the rights of parties to be heard and to have issues resolved without unnecessary cost or delay. A judge should monitor and supervise cases in ways that reduce or eliminate dilatory practices, avoidable delays, and unnecessary costs. NOTE: The Nebraska Supreme Court has adopted case progression standards at Neb. Ct. R. §§ 6-101 through 6-104, and has adopted a rule concerning the filing of cases under advisement reports, as set forth in Appendix B herein. § 5-302.5 amended January 31, 2018.
Provenance
- Source
- nebraskajudicial.gov
- Retrieved
- 2026-09-15
- Edition
- 2026-09-14
- Content hash
735fee0b42190bb1944088c669987bcf06e9a643f1cee10729ab9e220d8367d7
The link goes to the issuing authority’s own document — the one we read to produce this record. Where a source publishes whole titles rather than sections, your browser may need a moment to jump to the provision.
Unofficial copy of government-published law, reproduced from official sources with full provenance. Not an official publication; verify against official sources before relying on it in a filing. Records in the 'guidance' corpus, and only that corpus, are sub-regulatory (interpretive guidelines, survey procedures) and are not binding law. Validity bounds follow each jurisdiction's declared temporalBasis.